ASRock 4Core1600P35-WiFi+

Published on January 16, 2008
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 4 of 9
Discuss This Article

BIOS:

While the 4Core1600P35-WiFi+ motherboard brings several changes on the ASRock front, an AMI (American Megatrends Inc) BIOS is still used. The BIOS version used during testing was M0.27D. The BIOS settings were ho-hum and accompanied by limited options for overclocking, which isn't surprising for an ASRock motherboard. The CPU frequency range is from 90MHz to 800MHz and there is manual CPU voltage control, but no bounds were specified when using an Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 processor. The DRAM voltage can go up to 2.72V while the northbridge, southbridge, and VTT had voltage options of auto, low, middle, high, and highest. From this area, there is also an option for controlling the ASRock WiFi TX strength. The options for the WiFi strength were auto, low, normal, high, and ultra high. From the hardware health event monitoring area, the CPU and motherboard temperatures are displayed as well as the fan speeds and Vcore, +3.30, +5.00, and +12.00 voltages.


Overclocking:

ASRock motherboards have long been known as one of the brands to stay clear from if you are an overclocker, but with a new OC Tuner feature, they seem to be dipping further into the enthusiast world. ASRock's OC Tuner is a graphical-based overclocking tool that runs within Windows and is similar to the utilities from other motherboard vendors. Among these features include CPU/PCI frequency control, voltage control, hardware monitoring (temperature, voltage, fan speed), and tuning other options. Unfortunately, ASRock's OC Tuner is available only for Microsoft Windows operating systems at this time. However, even with the limited overclocking options from the BIOS we still had achieved a nice overclock for a budget ASRock motherboard. With no trouble, at all we had pushed an Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 to 2.625GHz.

Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  2. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  3. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  4. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  5. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  6. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  7. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  8. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  9. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  10. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  11. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  2. Radeon 7770 Can't reclock crash kernel
  3. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  4. Xserver 1.14 support will arrive with Catalyst...
  5. Radeon HD 7850 Catalyst wine performance
  6. Fedora 18 Comes To ARMv6, Raspberry Pi
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite