1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking Benchmarking Platform
Phoromatic Test Orchestration

Linux vs. Windows Power Usage

Michael Larabel

Published on 16 October 2007
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 2 - 13 Comments

Since publishing our Ubuntu power tests, where we had monitored the power consumption of the past six Ubuntu releases going back two years on a laptop, we've had repeated requests for a power comparison between Windows and different Linux distributions. Well, in this article are the first set of results from that testing. We've compared the power consumption of Microsoft Windows XP, Windows Vista, Fedora 7, and Ubuntu 7.10.

For these tests we hadn't used the Lenovo ThinkPad R52 notebook again, but had turned to an older hardware configuration. This is the same system from our Linux For Older PC Hardware article, which consisted of an Intel Pentium 4 1.46GHz (Northwood) processor, 2 x 512MB DDR-400, Western Digital 80GB 8MB cache ATA-100 hard drive, DVD-ROM, and an ASUS P4SGX-MX motherboard. This motherboard uses the SiS 650GX + 962L Chipset and has SiS Real 256 graphics.

Like our Ubuntu power testing, a SeaSonic Power Angel was used for measuring the power consumption of the system. The operating systems used was Microsoft Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 2, Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate, Fedora 8 Test 3 with a Linux 2.6.23 kernel testing release, and Ubuntu 7.10 with the Linux 2.6.22 kernel. All software was left at their default settings and configuration. For these four operating systems, we had monitored the power consumption when the system was idling on the desktop and then again while the system was being used. While not very scientific, for our "usage" power benchmarks the Wattage was recorded after launching the default web browser, mounting a CD, and loading up other common desktop applications. These benchmarks are just meant to quickly show the differences in power consumption between the four testing operating systems on the hardware configuration stated above.

Latest Articles & Reviews
  1. Ubuntu 15.04 Offers Faster OpenGL For AMD Radeon GPUs On Open-Source
  2. Ubuntu 15.04 Brings Some Graphics Performance Improvements For Intel Haswell
  3. Sub-$20 802.11n USB WiFi Adapter That's Linux Friendly
  4. The Lenovo T450s Is Working Beautifully With Linux
  5. Linux 4.0 SSD EXT4 / Btrfs / XFS / F2FS Benchmarks
  6. Linux 4.0 Hard Drive Comparison With Six File-Systems
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 4.1-rc1 Kernel Released, Packs In Several New Features
  2. It Doesn't Look Like KDBUS Will Make It For Linux 4.1
  3. Debian 9.0 Is Codenamed Stretch
  4. AMD Radeon GPUs With Linux 4.0 + Mesa 10.6-devel
  5. The Many Features Of The Linux 4.1 Kernel
  6. HTTPS For Phoronix.com
  7. Gallium3D's HUD Gets New Customization Options
  8. Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 Haswell Performance
  9. Dell Keyboard Backlight Support In Linux 4.1
  10. With Linux 4.1 You Can Play With The Chrome OS Lightbar
Most Viewed News This Week
  1. AMD Releases New "AMDGPU" Linux Kernel Driver & Mesa Support
  2. Ubuntu's Desktop-Next Switching From .DEBs To Snappy
  3. Systemd Kills Off Shutdownd
  4. My Favorite Computer Desk Of The Past Decade For Less Than $100
  5. AMD Open-Sources "Addrlib" From Catalyst
  6. Debian 8.0 Jessie Is Ready For Release This Weekend
  7. GIMP's Porting To GTK3 Continues
  8. Qt Creator 3.4 Brings C++ Programming Improvements & More