Intel Celeron D

Published on November 13, 2004
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6
Discuss This Article

Intel Celeron processors have long been known for being a “budget processor” and lacking the abilities to compete with other processors mainly due to the lack of L2 cache. In recent months, Intel has been redesigning their budget processors and has created the Celeron D line of processors, similar to AMD and their Sempron line. The new Celeron D series encompasses twice the amount of L2 cache over the original Celerons and now boasts a Prescott core. However, are these improvements enough to make you consider the Celeron D's in your next low-end PC purchase?

Features:

Model: Intel Celeron D
Core: Prescott
Operating Frequency: 2.40GHz
FSB: 533MHz
Cache: L1/12K+16K; L2/256K
Process: 90 nm
Socket: Socket 478
Multimedia Instruction: MMX, SSE, SSE2, & SSE3
· Data Flow Analysis
· Speculative Execution
· Non-Blocking Level 1 Cache
· Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
· Dual Independent Bus (DIB)

With Intel implementing their new naming scheme, this processor is simply no longer named a 2.4GHz Celeron D, but a Celeron D 320. Six different processors currently compose the “D” line of processors, which include the 315 (2.26GHz), 320 (2.40GHz), 325 (2.53GHz), 330 (2.66GHz), 335 (2.80GHz), and 340 (2.93GHz). These new names are based upon the architecture, clock speed, cache, Front Side Bus, and future Intel technologies, since Intel is jumping off the megahertz rush and is focusing more upon the different features. Below is a chart comparing the Intel Celeron D against the Socket 478 traditional Celeron, Pentium 4 “A”, Pentium 4 “C” (Northwood), and Pentium 4 “E” (Prescott).

  FSB (MHz) Manufacturing Process L2 Cache
Intel Celeron D: 533 90 nm 256K
Intel Celeron: 400 0.13 micron 128K
Pentium 4 (A): 400 0.13 micron 512K
Pentium 4 (C): 800 90 nm 512K
Pentium 4 (E): 800 90 nm 1MB

<< Previous Page
1
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  2. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  3. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  4. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  5. Phoronix Test Suite 4.6.0 "Utsira" Released
  6. New Intel X.Org Driver Supports All Of Haswell
  7. SQLite Now Faster With Memory Mapped I/O
  8. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has Bug-Fixes
  9. Qt For Tizen Launches, Based On Qt 5.1
  10. KTAP Released For Linux Kernel Dynamic Tracing
  11. Linux 3.10-rc2 Kernel Takes In A Few Extra Pulls
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Chrome 27 Loads Web Pages Faster
  2. Microsoft Releases Skype For Linux 4.2, Has...
  3. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  4. Linux's "Ondemand" Governor Is No...
  5. Humble Indie Bundle Finally Sells Out
  6. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite