X.Org 7.2: ATI Open v. Closed Drivers

The last time we had compared the ATI display drivers was last October with X.Org 7.1 and a Mobility Radeon X300. In those tests the open-source drivers had taken a beating over the binary blob in Enemy Territory and Unreal Tournament 2003. In today's tests, we had used a Radeon X800XL with X.Org 7.2 and the latest fglrx display drivers (8.33.6). With respect for the differences between the X300 and X800, the results had not changed much. The ATI/AMD fglrx driver continues to lead in the frame-rate performance over the open-source Radeon driver. In Enemy Territory the fglrx driver was over twice as fast, while in Unreal Tournament 2004 the performance difference for the fglrx driver spiked at 460% faster.

While these fglrx drivers are faster for gamers, the open-source drivers continue to boast the advantages of desktop effects support (AIGLX), inclusion with a majority of recent distributions, and simply the fact that the drivers are open-source. Feel free to discuss this article in the Phoronix Forums.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.