1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Xeon 5300 Clovertown

Michael Larabel

Published on 14 November 2006
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 7 - Comment On This Article

On November 2, 2006 the embargo for Intel's Core 2 Extreme Quad QX6700 was lifted which resulted in a slurry of reviews covering this flagship desktop processor. However, this morning happens to be an important date for Supercomputing 2006 and it serves as yet another milestone for Intel Corporation. This morning Intel will be introducing the Xeon 5300 series, or perhaps better known by its codename of Clovertown. At Phoronix we have had these processors in-house for over a week now and today are able to share our thoughts on these quad-core server/workstation processors as we test them under GNU/Linux.

The introduction of Clovertown is coming quickly after the successful launch of the Xeon 5100 series (Woodcrest), which had only happened back on June 26 of this year. This server/workstation version of the Intel Core 2 processor (launched on July 27, 2006) had performed extremely well in our tests when compared against the Xeon 5000 Dempsey (Intel Xeon 5150 Performance). Intel has been quick to speed the adoption of quad-core processors, while Advanced Micro Devices will not even be producing quad-core server or desktop chips until the second half of 2007. Intel is confident with its quad-core adoption and they have pledged to ship one million of these processors before AMD is able to deliver Deerhound (codename for AMD's first quad-core processor). However, these first generation four-core processors (Kentsfield and Clovertown) are really nothing more than two dual-core chips placed onto a single package. This process is similar to Intel's original dual-core Pentium D Smithfield, which was two Prescott cores bonded together on a single LGA-775 processor substrate. One of the benefits this time around is the power efficiency -- the issues that had faced Smithfield should not plague the Kentsfield or Clovertown. Another benefit of this approach, and will assist in Intel's hope for a quick adoption, is the price-point for these quad-core Xeons, which should be approximately the same as the dual-core versions. Intel's fabrication facilities can quickly adapt to the manufacturing needs of the Clovertown and Kentsfield depending upon market demand. The downside, however, with this design is that the two sets of cores communicate with each other using the system Front Side Bus (FSB).

With the Core Micro-architecture implementation the Clovertown is able to benefit from Wide Dynamic Execution, Intelligent Power Capability, Advanced Smart Cache, and Advanced Digital Media Boost. Like the Woodcrests, Clovertown shares a 65nm manufacturing process. Intel's Xeon 5300 lineup consists of the X5355, E5345, E5320, E5310, and E5335, which come clocked at 2.66GHz, 2.33GHz, 1.86GHz, 1.60GHz, and 2.00GHz respectively. The Xeon E5335, however, will not be available until Q1'2007. Clovertown processors use 8MB of L2 cache and a 1333MHz FSB, while the lower-end models will revert to a slightly lower 1066MHz FSB. The flagship X5355 quad-core comes clocked at 2.66GHz with a 120W TDP, which is in comparison to the fastest Woodcrest (Xeon 5160) at 3.00GHz with an 80W power consumption. With the exception of the X5355, the other Clovertown processors all have an 80W TDP; however, coming out later will be a 50W alternative. Another difference between Clovertown models is that the E5310 and E5335 lack support for demand-based switching.

The processors we have in front of us today are labeled Intel Confidential, but they are using production silicon and are the same as what will be available through the retail channels. These chips were made in Costa Rica and come from the Xeon E5320 series. As always, many thanks go out to Intel and Tyan for this launch-day opportunity.

Surely pass 640-721 exam with help of our best quality pass4sure 98-367 dumps. Also sign up for wide series of 1z0-053 certification prep tools.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. AMD Launches New FX CPUs, Cuts Prices On Existing Processors
  2. Preview: AMD's FX-9590 Eight-Core At Up To 5.0GHz On Linux
  3. Intel Launches The Core i7 5960X, Mighty Powerful Haswell-E CPUs
  4. AMD Radeon R9 290: Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. LLVM Clang 3.5 Brings Some Compiler Performance Improvements
  2. Ondemand vs. Performance CPU Governing For AMD FX CPUs On Linux 3.17
  3. How Intel Graphics On Linux Compare To Open-Source AMD/NVIDIA Drivers
  4. The Fastest NVIDIA GPUs For Open-Source Nouveau With Steam Linux Gaming
Latest Linux News
  1. POCL Is Maturing Well For Running OpenCL On The CPU
  2. New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd
  3. The Features To Find With The Imminent Release Of LLVM/Clang 3.5
  4. Borderlands 2 Is Coming To Linux
  5. The Witcher 2 Ups The Performance More & Works Around Catalyst Bug
  6. Running Gallium3D's LLVMpipe On The Eight-Core 5GHz CPU
  7. Trying Intel OpenCL On Linux For Video Encoding
  8. GSoC 2014 Yielded Some Improvements For Mesa/X.Org This Year
  9. webOS Lives On As LuneOS With New Release
  10. Marek Lands Radeon Gallium3D HyperZ Improvements
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Lennart Poettering Talks Up His New Linux Vision That Involves Btrfs
  2. nv and xorg.conf under Debian PPC
  3. AMD graphics doesn't work with AMD Catalyst drivers
  4. Best Radeon for a Power Mac G5?
  5. The dangers of Linux kernel development
  6. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  7. AMD Releases UVD Video Decode Support For R600 GPUs
  8. SSD seems slow