1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel EIST SpeedStep

Michael Larabel

Published on 16 February 2006
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 5 of 5 - Comment On This Article

With the load results, there was an approximate 14°C difference in the temperature between 800MHz and 1.86GHz, and a 6-13 Watt difference. There was also an impressionable difference between the idle and load measurements. To see the performance impact upon the various SpeedStep levels, we had timed the LAME compilation process with GCC, timed the LAME encoding process, monitored the average frame-rate inside of Enemy Territory, and measured the Mflops using the Opstone Sparse-Vector Scalar Product benchmark. It is important to note, that if using the default SpeedStep configuration, the frequency and voltages will immediately return to their default values when launching any CPU intensive work. However, we performed these tests to see precisely the performance differences if you were to choose over-riding the levels in order to reduce heat, power consumption, and a cooler/quieter environment. All four of these tests are CPU centric, with three of them being real-world scenarios. Enemy Territory was chosen for the gaming benchmark, as it is largely CPU limited with current-generation graphics cards. The Opstone Sparse-Vector Scalar Product benchmark can be obtained from BlueSailSoftware, and during testing the Pentium 4 optimized build was used. During this portion of the testing, the computer was powered directly by the IBM power adapter.

To differentiate between the traditional SpeedStep/Geyserville Technology and Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology, EIST allows for multiple frequency/voltage levels instead of simply two, which was found on the original implementation. As with AMD Cool 'n' Quiet Technology, the increased number of power-states allows for superior performance control with optimal savings when it comes to the power consumption, battery life, heat output, and noise level. With Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology, the frequency switch is software controlled, rather than toggling the GHI# pin between two states, and is supportive under Linux (with the 2.6 kernel and cpufreq) and of course Microsoft Windows. Another benefit to EIST is that the states are changed by having the software write to the processor model specific registers (MSRs), which eliminates Chipset dependency. The processor also controls the voltage changes internally to ensure a safe and glitch free transition. As far as the lag goes when switching from a non-demanding task (i.e. browsing the Internet) to a demanding test (i.e. audio encoding) there is up to a 10 micro second delay during which the processor core(s) and L2 cache are unavailable. Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology also offers an improved thermal monitor mode. For this mode, when the on-die thermal sensor reaches a high die temperature, the processor has the ability to automatically switch down to a lower frequency/voltage in the model specific registers. Once the CPU die temperature drops to a lower thermal value, the transition to the previous frequency/voltage level occurs. Some of Intel's other low power features include AutoHALT Powerdown, HALT/Grant Snoop, Sleep, Deep Sleep, and Deeper Sleep. Looking over our EIST results today using a Pentium M 750 mounted inside of a ThinkPad notebook, Intel's technology certainly has its advantages. Switching between the five power-modes, there was evident change in the CPU temperature as well as the power consumption. In addition, the frequency/voltages immediately scaled appropriately when switching between demanding and non-demanding environments. For those, however, seeking to over-ride the switching process at a low frequency/voltage, in order to conserve the battery life, heat output, and noise will find the performance to be severely hampered. As the last portion of our tests had shown, the compilation time had increased 212%, encoding time 218%, frame-rate had decreased 5FPS, and the Mflops had dropped over 57%.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. A Walkthrough Of The New 32 System Open-Source Linux Benchmarking Test Farm
  2. Habey MITX-6771: Mini-ITX Board With Quad-Core J1900 Bay Trail
  3. OCZ Vector 150 SSD On Linux
  4. Noctua i4 CPU Cooler: Great For Cooling High-End LGA-2011v3 CPUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. AMD Kaveri: Open-Source Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver
  2. 12-Way AMD Catalyst 14.12 vs. NVIDIA 346 Series Linux GPU Comparison
  3. AMD Catalyst 14.12 Omega Driver Brings Mixed Results For Linux Users
  4. 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison
Latest Linux News
  1. An Open Hardware Random Number Generator Proposed
  2. LLVM 3.6 Will Be Branched Next Month
  3. Opera Browser Puts Out Linux Updates For The Holidays
  4. GNOME Shell 3.15.3 Adds Support For High-Contrast Themes
  5. Linux 3.19: ThinkPad Muting Redone, New Dell Backlight Support, Acer Is Banging
  6. KVM Drops Support For IA64 While Adding Various x86 Improvements
  7. GCC 4.8.4 Officially Released
  8. FSF's High Priority Project List Now Has A Committee
  9. Details On Using OpenACC & GPUs With GCC
  10. Ubuntu 15.04 Alpha 1 For Its Various Flavors
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Need some hand holding with upgrading xserver
  2. Debian init discussion in Phoenix Wright format
  3. The New SuperTuxKart Looks Better, But Can Cause GPU/Driver Problems
  4. XLennart: A Game For Systemd Haters With Nothing Better To Do
  5. FPS capped on Linux (AMD fglrx drivers)
  6. Are there an app using HSA ?
  7. Bench specific mount point
  8. Tool for measuring FPS in games