1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Intel Centrino DDR2 Investigation

Michael Larabel

Published on 19 December 2005
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 1 of 6 - Comment On This Article

After Corsair's article earlier this year with their internal memory benchmark results on the performance impact of 1GB system memory versus 2GB, there have been countless articles from other publications, including Phoronix with our Linux 2GB testing, as to the true performance benefits from the expansion. Following suit over recent months has also been numerous manufacturers coming to the table with 2 x 1024MB kits for enthusiasts, gamers, and overclockers alike to replace the standard 2 x 512MB configuration. While 1024MB of system memory remains suitable for most applications, 2048MB is quickly becoming the de facto standard for those seeking the maximum real world benefits from their computer system. Nevertheless, this is a never-ending race as we still faintly recall the days of when a few Megabytes of system memory was considered overkill. However, in this mad memory upgrading rush how do the mobile systems fair with these memory upgrades? With one of our loaded Centrino systems in hand, we will see how these large memory capacities carry over to the mobile front. As DDR2 is quickly becoming the standard for system memory with all of Intel's latest i9XX series Chipsets taking advantage of the additional bandwidth, and AMD's next-generation CPUs are going to offer a DDR2-667 memory controller, we felt it wise to deliver our memory results using DDR2-533. Of course, the memory interface for notebooks is quite different with its 200-pin DDR2 SO-DIMM design compared to the 240-pin desktop alternative. The reason for this DDR2 memory take over is due to DDR reaching the end of the dock as following the standards set fourth by JEDEC, DDR can no longer scale any further, when it comes to non-overclocked frequencies. Although the mainstream i915GM and i915GMS Express Chipsets support the use of Double Data Rate Two, we turned to the Intel's only performance oriented Chipset that supports the use of DDR2 memory and that is their Mobile i915PM Express. Implemented with the i915PM is support for DDR2-400/533MHz system memory in either single or dual channel modes. Also powered by the Chipset is PCI Express x16 graphics, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology, Intel High Definition Audio, and the 533/400MHz Pentium M series. For investigative purposes we will be benchmarking the Centrino notebook with 512MB, 1GB, and finally 2GB of DDR2 system memory, which is the maximum capacity supported by the i915PM.

For the 512MB implementation, we will be using a single stick of Elpida's PC2-4200S-444. The Japanese 512MB memory stick uses Elpida E5116AB-5C-E chips in a double-sided 1 x 4 configuration with a batch number of 05220WPPK. The Elpida sticker is labeled EBE52UD6ABSA-5C-E and 0529AXG0601. For the 1024MB and 2048MB memory testing, we turned to the talented engineers over at OCZ Technology. To carry out the testing we chose a pair of OCZ's 1GB OCZ25331024VSO notebook memory modules. These modules are designed for CAS 4 operation, like a majority of the DDR2-533 notebook memory modules, and offers comparable timings of 4-4-4 with IBM's Elpida module. In addition to the DDR2-533MHz CAS 4-4-48 operation, the modules run at 1.8V and come with OCZ's lifetime warranty. Examining the OCZ modules, used onboard are Elpida's E5108AE-5C-E ICs. These ICs are the same parts as what we had found several months ago when reviewing Transcend's TS64MLQ64V5J 2 desktop DDR2 memory modules. To offer the 1GB module capacity, on each side of the PCB are the Elpida chips in a 2 x 4 array. The sticker on each module simply displays the speed (PC2-4200), type (1024MB SODIMM), series (Value), timings (4-4-4-8), and part number (OCZ25331024VSO). These two OCZ modules were not part of a kit and the ICs on each of the modules came from a different batch, 0529A9B0C and 0531A9B2H. As other 2 x 512MB parts had not arrived on time for this article, the 2 x 1GB memory configuration is the only area that will be able to benefit from dual channel technology.

In need of the Intel i915PM Express Chipset to maximize the DDR2 notebook memory performance, we turned to our faithful IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad R52 that we had coincidently used in our mobile cache comparison article that was published yesterday. Inside the notebook is an Intel Pentium M 750 processor, which features a 90nm manufacturing process, 2MB of L2 cache, and is clocked at 1.86GHz with a 533MHz FSB with Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology and Execute Bit Disable support. Powering the graphics needs is a respectable ATI X300 with dedicated video memory. The ThinkPad R52 has two 200-pin DDR2 SODIMM memory slots with one of them being located on the bottom side of the notebook while the additional slot is located underneath the keyboard.

Hardware Components
Processor: Intel Pentium M 750 (1.86GHz)
Motherboard: IBM R52 18494WU (i915PM + ICH-6M)
Graphics Card: ATI RADEON X300 64MB (dedicated)
Hard Drives: Toshiba Slim MK1032GAX
Optical Drives: DVD-RW Drive
Add-On Devices: Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG
Software Components
Operating System: FedoraCore4
Linux Kernel: 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4
GCC (GNU Compiler): 4.0.0
Graphics Driver: ATI v8.20.8
Xorg: 6.8.2

Loaded on the notebook was BIOS version 1.22 (76ET62WW) and the embedded controller version was v1.04. The benchmarks running on this system was our traditional set that consists of Enemy Territory, Doom 3, Quake 4, LAME Compilation, LAME Encoding, FreeBench, and finally RAMspeed. As you can see from our arsenal of traditional Linux memory benchmarks there is a great mixture of various games as well as applications to display the overall real-world system performance. During testing, all of the memory modules ran at their designed DDR2-533 speeds at 4-4-4-12 timings. On the following pages are our results from this investigation.

Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 & E5-2687W v3 Compared To The Core i7 5960X On Linux
  2. Intel 120GB 530 Series SSD Linux Performance
  3. Btrfs/EXT4/XFS/F2FS RAID 0/1/5/6/10 Linux Benchmarks On Four SSDs
  4. AMD's Windows Catalyst Driver Remains Largely Faster Than Linux Drivers
Latest Linux Articles
  1. NVIDIA vs. Nouveau Drivers With Linux 3.18 + Mesa 10.4-devel
  2. Is The Open-Source NVIDIA Driver Fast Enough For Steam On Linux Gaming?
  3. Linux 3.18 File-System Performance Minimally Changed But Possible Regressions
  4. AMD Radeon Gallium3D Is Catching Up & Sometimes Beating Catalyst On Linux
Latest Linux News
  1. V2 Of KDBUS Published For Linux Kernel Review
  2. VirtualBox 4.3.20 Arrives, Still No Sign Of VirtualBox 4.4
  3. Scientific Linux 6.6 vs. Scientific Linux 7.0 Benchmarks
  4. Qualcomm Looks To Get Into The ARM Server Business
  5. HHVM 3.4 Adds New Features, Support
  6. More Radeon Driver Changes Queued For Linux 3.19
  7. Unigine 2.0 Alpha 2 Adds C# Support
  8. FFmpeg Is Returning To Ubuntu With 15.04 Release
  9. Linux Version Of Civilization: Beyond Earth Still Coming Along
  10. Yahoo To Become Default Search Provider For Firefox
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Cant get working Kaveri APU - A10-7850k
  2. Roadmap to Catalyst 14.10 ?
  3. Debian Init System Coupling Vote Results
  4. The Slides Announcing The New "AMDGPU" Kernel Driver
  5. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  6. Debian Developer Resigns From The Systemd Maintainership Team
  7. Ubuntu Developers Still Thinking What To Do About Adobe Flash Support
  8. How to get rid of Linux