1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Memory
  5. Motherboards
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Storage
  9. Operating Systems


Facebook RSS Twitter Twitter Google Plus


Phoronix Test Suite

OpenBenchmarking.org

Doom 3 v. Quake 4 Performance

Michael Larabel

Published on 22 October 2005
Written by Michael Larabel
Page 3 of 3 - Comment On This Article

In many respects, the Quake 4 game-play is incredibly similar to that of Doom 3; however, its frame-rate is evidently different. When performing the weakest of the strenuous benchmarks, 1024 x 768 - Low Quality, there was a mere 6.8 frame per second difference, but once we began enabling AA and AF, the results began to slide together. Whilst the settings were at 1280 x 1024 - High Quality - 8xS AA/8x AF, there was merely a 1.4 frame difference between the two games. Although no results can be decisively concluded due to the slight difference in testing demos, in general we've found Quake 4 to be more GPU demanding than CPU bound. More or less, the performance between Quake 4 and Doom 3 is similar but Quake 4 is using a tweaked/updated version of the Doom 3 engine and its technologies. Keep in mind, our testing of course was all under Linux, and the Windows version of Quake 4 is likely to share a different fate. It's also note worthy that upon the much-anticipated release of the NVIDIA Linux 1.0-8XXX (Rel80) drivers, these results are likely to change even more and at that time, we'll deliver some updated numbers.

About The Author
Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the web-site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience and being the largest web-site devoted to Linux hardware reviews, particularly for products relevant to Linux gamers and enthusiasts but also commonly reviewing servers/workstations and embedded Linux devices. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics hardware drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated testing software. He can be followed via and or contacted via .
Latest Linux Hardware Reviews
  1. 13-Way Low-End GPU Comparison With AMD's AM1 Athlon
  2. ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs
  3. Mini-Box M350: A Simple, Affordable Mini-ITX Case
  4. Overclocking The AMD AM1 Athlon & Sempron APUs
Latest Linux Articles
  1. How Much Video RAM Is Needed For Catalyst R3 Graphics?
  2. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs. 14.04 LTS Cloud Benchmarks
  3. Ubuntu 12.04.4 vs. 13.10 vs. 14.04 LTS Desktop Benchmarks
  4. AMD OpenCL Performance With AM1 Kabini APUs
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux 3.15 Lands Some DRM Graphics Driver Fixes
  2. AMD Is Disabling DPM Support For RV770 GPUs
  3. ReactOS Working On A Community Windows OS
  4. Borderlands Is Being Considered For Linux
  5. Mesa 10.0 & 10.1 Stable Get Updated
  6. Getting Hit By The Variable Performance Of The Public Cloud
  7. Git 2.0 Test Releases Begin With Many Changes
  8. Wine 1.7.17 Works On Its Task Scheduler, C Run-Time
  9. The Improv ARM Board Still Isn't Shipping; Riding A Dead Horse?
  10. Debian To Maintain 6.0 Squeeze As An LTS Release
  11. Wasteland 2 Is Finally Released For Linux Gamers
  12. FreeBSD Advances For ARM, Bhyve, Clang
Latest Forum Discussions
  1. Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
  2. Catalyst 14.3 Beta
  3. Suggestions about how to make a Radeon HD 7790 work decently?
  4. The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money
  5. Radeon 8000M problematic on Linux?
  6. Linux Kernel Developers Fed Up With Ridiculous Bugs In Systemd
  7. After Jack Keane, RuseSoft will briing Ankh 3 to Linux through Desura
  8. Suspected PHP Proxy Issue