OCZ EL DDR PC-4000 2GB Gold Edition Dual Channel

Published on September 22, 2005
Written by David Lin
Page 7 of 7
Discuss This Article

Conclusion:

Overall these modules performed very well. Even though we weren’t able to overclock past 260MHz, our Athlon 64 Venice’s memory controller could possibly be at fault here. From our previous tests we determined that our Venice is unfortunately not a very good overclocker, and its memory controller is a bit short of phenomenal. The CAS Latency of three did noticeably influence some benchmarks. In the synthetic benchmarks, the 2GB kit lagged behind the OCZ GX 1GB kit. In Doom 3, it also lagged behind by a few frames in each test. However in real world gaming we didn’t notice the difference. One of the biggest advantages of having 2GB however is during every day usage. We were able to run various Linux programs all at the same time and noticed no lag compared against its PC-4000 1GB counterpart. For Windows users who are plagued with having massive paging files on their hard disks, 2GB of RAM can enable the user to run without a paging file at all. The advantage of this would be that games would not have to load temporary files to the hard drive. Overall, the disadvantages of these particular 2GB modules are minimal. Although the increased CAS Latency does make a difference during gaming and in benchmarks, the advantages experienced during real world usage outweigh the drawbacks. Overclockers will have to consider other options, such as modules that use Micron -5B D chips.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.


Phoronix Product Rating: 8 / 10

7
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  2. Gallium3D Continues Improving OpenGL For Older Radeon GPUs
  3. 15-Way Open vs. Closed Source NVIDIA/AMD Linux GPU Comparison
  4. Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings
Latest Software Articles
  1. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  2. The Cost Of Ubuntu Disk Encryption
  3. Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. XFS vs. F2FS On Linux 3.10
  4. AMD Radeon R600 GPU LLVM 3.3 Back-End Testing
Latest Linux News
  1. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  2. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces Feature Release
  3. New NVIDIA Linux Driver Supports The GeForce GTX 780
  4. Chrome 28 To Offer More Speed Improvements
  5. Digia Announces "Boot To Qt" Project
  6. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  7. Wayland's Weston Gets Output Scaling Support
  8. Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer
  9. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  10. Intel Ultrabook Performance Is Faster With Mesa 9.2
  11. Hot Relocation HDD To SSD Support For Btrfs
Latest Forum Talk
  1. X.Org Libraries Hit By Round Of Security Issues
  2. Linux Desktop Security Could Be A Whole Lot Better
  3. Intel Linux OpenGL Driver Leading Over Apple OS X
  4. Debian GNU/Hurd 2013 Release Brings New Packages
  5. KDE 4.11 Will Be The Last Major KDE4 Workspaces...
  6. Sumo Lounge Emperor
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite