AMD Venice v. San Diego Core Performance

Published on July 05, 2005
Written by Richard Chu
Page 5 of 5
Discuss This Article

Conclusion:

Thanks to the 1MB cache in the San Diego, the extra cache proves to be beneficial in certain tasks, as shown in the Linux compiling process. The performance advantage is close to 10% in compiling LAME. In other benchmarks, such as Doom 3, the advantage of San Diego is roughly 5% at best. For Doom 3, we saw a 3-5% performance increase from the Venice to the San Diego, though as the quality gets higher, the performance increase diminished to less than 2%. However, this is partially due to the graphic card used to perform this benchmark. For archiving and extraction, the results were very interesting. Venice performed better than San Diego across the board, and it isn’t too difficult to conclude that the extra speed offered no advantage in terms of file archiving and extraction; hard drive RPM and cache are the influencing factors that determine the speed of these actions. When compiling using GCC was really the only benchmark that decisively showed the San Diego as the clear winner over the Venice. This means the San Diego is faster than Venice at compiling LAME by roughly 10%. On with the Opstone benchmarks, the San Diego and Venice ran neck and neck, and the San Diego offered less than 5% of an advantage over the Venice. In conclusion, for average users, we found that the San Diego offers an average of 3% higher return than its counter part, Venice, when running at the same clock speed. With the pricing of the cheapest San Diego around $330, Venice 3200+ around $195, and Venice 3500+ around $275, it comes down to whether paying the premium price of the San Diego is justified. The AMD San Diego is one hell of a screamer for single-core setups, but with its high price tag, the small performance increase isn't truly justified unless you'll be coding and compiling all day or a similar CPU intensive process.

Discuss this article in our forums, IRC channel, or email the author. You can also follow our content via RSS and on social networks like Facebook, Identi.ca, and Twitter (@Phoronix and @MichaelLarabel). Subscribe to Phoronix Premium to view our content without advertisements, view entire articles on a single page, and experience other benefits.

5
Next Page >>
Latest Hardware Reviews
  1. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 vs. AMD Radeon Graphics On Linux
  2. Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 Performance On Ubuntu Linux
  3. Intel Core i7 4770K "Haswell" Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
  4. The First Experience Of Intel Haswell On Linux
Latest Software Articles
  1. Optimized Binaries Provide Great Benefits For Intel Haswell
  2. 11-Way Linux, BSD Platform Comparison
  3. SNA Acceleration Works Great For Intel Core i7 Haswell
  4. The Linux Evolution For Intel Haswell's Performance
Latest Linux News
  1. KDE's KWin Made Lots Of Progress In 4.11
  2. Ubuntu Announces Carrier Advisory Group
  3. Qt 5.1 Release Candidate 1 Has Arrived
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Subversion 1.8 Presents New Features
  6. LLVM 3.3 Officially Released
  7. LLVM/Clang Now Uses Loop Vectorizer At New Levels
  8. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  9. Coreboot Doing AMD USB 3.0, Q35 QEMU Emulation
  10. VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome
  11. openSUSE 13.1 M2 Plays On PulseAudio 4.0
Latest Forum Talk
  1. Planetary Annihilation Plans To Come To Linux
  2. Benchmarks Of NVIDIA's New Linux GPU Driver
  3. Intel GPU Driver Tries To Rip Out FBDEV Support
  4. In-Fighting Continues Over Mir On Non-Unity Ubuntu
  5. Commodity Tips
  6. I got robbed at gunpoint today....
  1. Computers
  2. Display Drivers
  3. Graphics Cards
  4. Motherboards
  5. Peripherals
  6. Processors
  7. Software
  8. Operating Systems
  9. All Articles
  1. Linux Benchmarking
  2. OpenBenchmarking.org
  3. Phoronix Test Suite