RADV Mesa 17.1-dev vs. AMDGPU-PRO 16.60 Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 17 February 2017 at 10:06 AM EST. Page 3 of 3. 22 Comments.
Vulkan One Year AMD

When running at 4K, the RadeonSI Mesa 17.1-dev vs. AMDGPU-PRO 16.60 performance was very close for OpenGL.

Vulkan One Year AMD

But the Vulkan performance leaned heavily in favor of AMDGPU-PRO. There's still more work to be done on RADV and these results show there still are improvements AMD could make if they were to open-source their Vulkan driver or at least begin contributing to RADV.

Vulkan One Year AMD

With The Talos Principle, RADV had run into the video mode error mentioned previously, so this is it for the comparison today. Over the weekend some more RadeonSI Mesa 17.1-dev vs. AMDGPU-PRO 16.60 results will be completed.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
AMD Quietly Funded A Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built On ROCm: It's Now Open-Source
Trying Out & Benchmarking The New Experimental Intel Xe Linux Graphics Driver
Intel's Open-Source Compute Runtime Performing Increasingly Well Against NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver
Intel Arc Graphics See Faster Performance On Ubuntu 23.10
Raspberry Pi 5 Graphics Continue With Open-Source Driver & Crazy Fast Compared To RPi 4
Initial Benchmarks Of The "NVK" Open-Source NVIDIA Vulkan Driver
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.