USB Flash Drive File-System Tests On Fedora

Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 29 December 2014 at 02:30 AM EST. Page 4 of 4. 22 Comments.

When running one Dbench client, EXT4 and XFS were much faster than EXT3 and Btrfs.

Compile Bench showed more wins for EXT4 followed by XFS, but for these speeds were beyond the limitations of the USB 3.0 flash drive so there was some caching involved and not being entirely limited to the disk drive.

Overall from the tests ran in this simple file-system comparison on USB 3.0 flash drives, of the file-systems tested EXT4 did very well along with XFS. This is in terms of raw file-system performance but not looking at the reliability of the file-systems on USB flash drives. Also missing were F2FS, exFAT, and FAT32 due to the aforementioned reasons. This was just a small comparison but hopefully you'll find this data of some use, which can also be found on OpenBenchmarking.org. Those interested in the 64GB USB 3.0 Lexar flash drive that was used for testing, it can be found for just $20 USD at Amazon.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.