![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's all here: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...91111094923390
I _really_ can't believe that... So what now? Will Ubuntu have to pay Microsoft for rights to use sudo?!? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess they'll have a hard time if they insist on Ubuntu and the likes paying them licensing-fees. Might make an interesting court-case though, since there's undeniable evidence that sudo has been around way longer than Microsofts patents. Maybe that'd finally make the law-makers realize what a pile of bullshit software-patents are.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art In fact, it is more than likely just another nail in MS's coffin (under construction), since crap like this will be cited in every MS anti-trust case that hits courts anywhere. Basically, you should cross your fingers and HOPE that MS does something TRULY STUPID, like try to enforce this "patent". |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
They can patent it all they want, they won't get anything out of it because you can simply throw the 1980 version of sudo at them.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its not just sudo that counts as "prior art". A whole bunch of stuff related to POLICY KIT actually matches the "pretty pictures" part of this "patent".
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
MS is just being a troll patenting stuff like sudo. I sure hope the USPTO shoots down the application
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|