Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Hardware > Processors & Memory

Processors & Memory Discuss both AMD and Intel processors (CPUs) and system memory. Cooling products for processors and overclocking can also be discussed.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2009, 12:10 AM
phoronix phoronix is offline
Phoronix News Bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,103
Default Intel Core i5 750, Core i7 870 Linux Benchmarks

Phoronix: Intel Core i5 750, Core i7 870 Linux Benchmarks

Now that we have provided a brief overview of the Intel P55 and how it functions under Linux, our larger area of concentration is looking at the Linux performance of the P55 with the new Core i5 750 and Core i7 870 processors. We have a number of benchmarks in this article along with more information on these Lynnfield processors.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14174
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2009, 01:27 AM
Dark_Star Dark_Star is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
Default

Awesome Thanks for the review..

So it seems my Phenom II X4 will have significant lead over these i5 and i7

Could you please include some Phenom II X4 955 benchmarks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2009, 01:50 AM
vermaden vermaden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
Default

What sense in comparing Intel quad core CPU to AMD tri core CPU?

You should at least include Intel Core 2 Quad CPU (to compare architecture improovements) and AMD Phenom II X4 (to compare new Intel CPUs to REAL competiotion, not to some weaker and cheaper tripple core Phenom II X3).

These whole benchmarks just compare Intel i5 to Intel i7 CPUs performance and nothimg more ... really disapoining.

Why waste time at all for such uncomplete tests?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2009, 02:00 AM
Pepazdepa Pepazdepa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden View Post
These whole benchmarks just compare Intel i5 to Intel i7 CPUs performance and nothimg more ... really disapoining.

Why waste time at all for such uncomplete tests?
From my point of view, I can se Phenom X3 710 kicking Intel into his core i5 butt
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2009, 02:07 AM
Dark_Star Dark_Star is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 63
Default

I have ask amd senior executive to send some CPUs to Phoronix. But I would suggest you to ask your hardware vendor to lend them for testing.

A Quad should be tested with Quad.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:38 AM
Kano Kano is online now
Debian Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,899
Default

The benchmarks are interesting, where is the pts code to compare against? Also adding Phenom II X965, Intel Q9550, would be interesting, as they are from the same price range, i7 860 instead of 870 would be more logical too, as 870 is much more expensive than i7 920/860.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:59 AM
lem79 lem79 is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Dear God, putting AMD's tricore against Intel's newest quads? Poor AMD. Michael you should hit them up for a 955 at least! Very surprised to see the X3 outperforming the Nehalems in places.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-08-2009, 07:12 AM
lordmozilla lordmozilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 152
Default

Nice review, I'm guessing you only had that tricore at hand. But it really did do well. I was very impressed with its performance compared to Intel's i5 and i7.

Any chance you could add a Top of the range Phenom II X4 in there?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-08-2009, 07:44 AM
suokko suokko is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 110
Default

Looks like phenom is very fast core but lags in memory bandwidth so test that are memory limited are lose to AMD processors.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-08-2009, 08:50 AM
Hohlraum Hohlraum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6
Default

I think the only thing these benchmarks show is that Stream is the only software that accurately represents the performance of these processors over the AMD. I don't dislike AMD but I find it highly unlikely that it out performs ANY i7 processor on the market. If that is the case then Phoronix is the only review site I've ever seen that has come to this conclusion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.