Phoronix Forums  

Go Back   Phoronix Forums > Software > Desktop Linux

Desktop Linux Discussion of Linux on the desktop.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2008, 09:30 AM
phoronix phoronix is offline
Phoronix News Bot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,103
Default First There Was Compiz, Now There Is Compiz++

Phoronix: First There Was Compiz, Now There Is Compiz++

First there was Compiz, a compositing window manager that brought very interesting desktop effects to Linux, and then Beryl came about as a fork of Compiz before it ultimately turned into Compiz Fusion. Today though, on Christmas eve, the world can now meet Compiz++. Compiz++ is a branch of Compiz that brings several new features to the table and there are huge changes...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Njk1Ng
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:05 AM
EmbraceUnity EmbraceUnity is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 51
Default

I have a feeling that KWin's work has been instrumental in all of this. The fact that they are switching to cmake makes this pretty obvious.

I wonder if compiz will be replacing KWin in the future? Perhaps it can replace Metacity too. That would be a really great thing for the linux community. Or at least this modularization should make it much easier to share code between the projects.

Granted, it would be trickier to share with Metacity since it doesn't use C++.

Considering how many distos dump metacity for compiz, it would make perfect sense for GNOME to dump it too, and for all of us to rally around one window manager.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:18 AM
jijitus jijitus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Just like with KDE 4, if it's not stable enough it won't conquer users. I hope a new architecture will fix all glitches and bugs that plague Compiz Fusion today.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:30 AM
panda84 panda84 is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 100
Default

No Composite required, possible X Render backend, C++, CMake... is it Compiz or KWin?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:42 AM
d2kx d2kx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,066
Default

I think KDE users will stick to the amazingly fast developing KWin4 which works quite well already. Compiz(++) will become the standard for Gnome though, I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2008, 11:22 AM
deanjo deanjo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
I think KDE users will stick to the amazingly fast developing KWin4 which works quite well already. Compiz(++) will become the standard for Gnome though, I guess.
Not to mention KDE4 is pain free to get setup and use. Even works great in KDE3 when using kwin4 for your Window Manager.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2008, 01:36 PM
audi100quattro audi100quattro is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
"Compiz++ also introduces support for tiled textures, which allows larger pixmaps to be supported whereby its broken into smaller textures to avoid such limitations."
Does this mean I can use compiz++ on my 9500 with two 1440x900 screens and not get everything past 2048th pixel go black when I start it?

If true, I can't wait for this to hit the sunrise or x11 overlays in gentoo. This is what has been holding back my use of compositing. I used compiz when I had only one monitor, and then quit using it when I got two.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2008, 02:31 PM
Vadi Vadi is offline
Phoronix Test Suite Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 461
Default

I wonder how C people will react to this.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2008, 03:55 PM
RealNC RealNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
I wonder how C people will react to this.
It's sad to see so many people doing development for the sake of C than the other way around.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-24-2008, 05:15 PM
_txf_ _txf_ is offline
Phoronix Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
It's sad to see so many people doing development for the sake of C than the other way around.
yeah,so true. To me, opengl always seems to make more sense in c++ than in c. Likewise for gui toolkits, and no gobject does not count as an oo language
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2009 by Phoronix Media.