If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Soon Nokia will have to resort to faking those fake chinese phones from NOKLA . Goodbye, nokia. Hello NOKLA . Without R&D division there is no difference anyway :P
Soon Nokia will have to resort to faking those fake chinese phones from NOKLA . Goodbye, nokia. Hello NOKLA . Without R&D division there is no difference anyway :P
I don't know, to me it seems the nokia phones are already as aptly named as they can be.
In finland we have a saying "menneen talven lumia", directly translated: "last winter's snow", meaning: a thing that is old news, something that no one remembers anymore. One can only wonder if this was the inspiration for the latest line of nokia phones.
Tärkeimmät ajankohtaiset talousuutiset, pörssikurssit ja kattavat sijoittajapalvelut löydät Kauppalehdestä.
Also, apparently they are getting a new member on their board of directors, some woman named Elizabeth Doherty, with no experience from the tech industry. -_- WTF Nokia!?
Last edited by varikonniemi; 25 January 2013, 09:33 AM.
It seems nokia has been picking up bad habits from their new sugar daddy microsoft.
Nokia has been recently caught violating user privacy: Nokia cell phones route secure https connections via their own servers and decrypt your data
Well, that's what you can expect from proprietary corporations and proprietary software: they always try to fool their customers and treating them like retards. That's one of major reasons to stay away from these as far as you can. I'm personally consider proprietary software untrusted by default. Availability of source is a good indication that program vendor respects fair play. Sure, it's dumb to release sources if you backdoored and trojanized something: this increases chance to get caught and allows to uncloak this treason faster.
Nokia is the prime example as a corporate mismanagement can lead to ruin a company.
But since, as usual, the only who lose are the end users, given that competition will decrease while the top managers will keep their huge benefit in any case, is pretended that a system where few people command without assuming any financial responsibility on their shoulders, is perfect.
Comment