If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
[...]
I don't know about that. Somehow I find it hard to believe that independent developers who are developing games for the love of developing games would be troubled to patent what they create. Besides, if it's released it's already protected by copyright law and it can't be patented by someone else. No to mention that trying to patent some kind of game mechanic would be stupid. What if Id had patented "game that is controlled and viewed from a first person point of view with 3D environments". Actually, this might actually have been a good idea, as we wouldn't have the 337788 FPS franchises that exist today.
So they want to give the game the name of an already existing game? I see problems here..."]So they want to give the game the name of an already existing game? I see problems here...
the name "Cradle" is not protected for games currently. In the software area is something named CRADLE, but it looks like it isn't protected for games yet. So if they both finish their game with this name, and one of them protects the name. Then there could be issues for the other…
Comment