Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Many Interesting Tests Are Coming For The Phoronix 10th Birthday

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Many Interesting Tests Are Coming For The Phoronix 10th Birthday

    Phoronix: Many Interesting Tests Are Coming For The Phoronix 10th Birthday

    To end out May on a high note and in getting June kick-started, when Phoronix turns ten years old on 5 June, there is a lot of interesting upcoming content and Linux/open-source performance benchmarks...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    CudaMiner and OpenCL miner benchmarks

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by riklaunim View Post
      CudaMiner and OpenCL miner benchmarks
      Test profile additions welcome... As far as I know, those apps don't have an automated benchmark mode.
      Michael Larabel
      https://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Intel Bay Trail NUC vs Intel Haswell NUC vs AMD equivalent

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mendieta View Post
          Intel Bay Trail NUC vs Intel Haswell NUC vs AMD equivalent
          Bay Trail NUC is all I have with no Haswell NUC and no AMD equivalent, at least for that form factor.
          Michael Larabel
          https://www.michaellarabel.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Michael View Post
            Test profile additions welcome... As far as I know, those apps don't have an automated benchmark mode.
            CudaMiner has --benchmark but I must check if it can be stopped after X calculations.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by riklaunim View Post
              CudaMiner has --benchmark but I must check if it can be stopped after X calculations.
              Well if you can check and verify that it will return gracefully after X calculations, that would be good, and could lead to it being added for testing.
              Michael Larabel
              https://www.michaellarabel.com/

              Comment


              • #8
                It's doable. It can be timeouted:

                Code:
                ./cudaminer  --benchmark --time-limit 20
                	   *** CudaMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner ***
                	             This is version 2014-02-28 (beta)
                	based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
                	    Cuda additions Copyright 2013,2014 Christian Buchner
                	  LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm
                	  BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM
                	  YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] NVML GPU monitoring is not available.
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] 1 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M with compute capability 3.5
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] GPU #0: interactive: 1, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] GPU #0: 32 hashes / 4.0 MB per warp.
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] GPU #0: Performing auto-tuning (Patience...)
                [2014-05-27 01:57:56] GPU #0: maximum total warps (BxW): 483
                [2014-05-27 01:58:11] GPU #0: 49466.21 hash/s with configuration T12x4
                [2014-05-27 01:58:11] GPU #0: using launch configuration T12x4
                [2014-05-27 01:58:17] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.72 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:17] Total: 47.72 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:22] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.42 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:22] Total: 47.42 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:27] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.43 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:27] Total: 47.43 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:32] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.44 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:32] Total: 47.44 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:37] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.40 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:37] Total: 47.40 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:42] GPU #0: GeForce GT 740M, 47.42 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:42] Total: 47.42 khash/s
                [2014-05-27 01:58:43] workio thread dead, waiting for workers...
                [2014-05-27 01:58:43] worker threads all shut down, exiting.
                compute capability and the khash/s are the most important. Older Quadros on compute capability 1.1 got only ~27 khash/s on FX 3700 and around 7 on FX 580

                Going this rout there may be some CUDA kernels that could be adapter as a CUDA benchmarks. Someone familiar with them would have to help I guess.

                Comment


                • #9
                  More system benchmarks: real-world performance, a kernel 3.10 (at least) to 3.15 comparison, and what happened to the file system/block layer regressions found in past releases...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by halo9en View Post
                    More system benchmarks: real-world performance, a kernel 3.10 (at least) to 3.15 comparison, and what happened to the file system/block layer regressions found in past releases...
                    Been thinking about benchmarking all Linux 3.x kernels...
                    Michael Larabel
                    https://www.michaellarabel.com/

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X