Well, great! Then in court, when Microsoft will have to prove
non-obviousness again, insiders like you can testify for the
defense - nvidia or whoever can possibly get sued.
However, if what you're saying is true, the patent is junk and
nobody will ever get sued.
Many times it is the case that patent office will grant a patent if
it's not sure, because during the trial the whole patent procedure
(like proving the first inventor and non-obviousness) has to repeated,
and all potential mistakes of the patent office wouldn't matter.
It creates these junk patents, that make the news in non-legal,
opinionated websites.
non-obviousness again, insiders like you can testify for the
defense - nvidia or whoever can possibly get sued.
However, if what you're saying is true, the patent is junk and
nobody will ever get sued.
Many times it is the case that patent office will grant a patent if
it's not sure, because during the trial the whole patent procedure
(like proving the first inventor and non-obviousness) has to repeated,
and all potential mistakes of the patent office wouldn't matter.
It creates these junk patents, that make the news in non-legal,
opinionated websites.
Originally posted by movieman
View Post
Comment