Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

    Phoronix: Radeon KMS Gets Faster X-Video Support

    If using the latest ATI open-source driver Git code for kernel mode-setting, there may be slightly better X-Video support without any visual slowdowns/problems. Pauli Nieminen has changed around the code so that a video buffer is allocated in the GTT (Graphics Translation Table) to provide faster memory operations that haven't been accelerated by KMS. The patch that provides the performance boost to X-Video under ATI kernel mode-setting can be found on the xorg-driver-ati mailing list and has since been committed...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    What they really need to speed up is basic 2D accel. Still, any speed improvement with KMS is a good thing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Melcar View Post
      What they really need to speed up is basic 2D accel. Still, any speed improvement with KMS is a good thing.
      EXA is already relatively fast, and even my lowly RV710 runs Compiz smoothly.

      Comment


      • #4
        With KMS? My HD4850 is chocking with simple 2D tasks. On my older card it's not as bad though.

        Comment


        • #5
          Xv was already working very good here. One of the areas where the oss driver really shines compared to fglrx. But of course any improvement is still welcome

          And I agree that EXA under KMS could use some speed improvement. I'm now in the situation where I have 2 screens, one fully accelerated EXA/Xv/3D, and one with only shadowfb 'acceleration'. Many 2D operations are much faster with shadowfb than with EXA acceleration.

          There are also at least two bug reports regarding this:


          Comment


          • #6
            Xv works fine for the most part, except for some videos where it simply won't play or cause the players to crash. That Planet Earth birds clip that everyone likes for example. Interestingly enough, if I use the mplayer build from here it plays fine; smooth playback actually, despite my CPU usage going up the roof (not even even fglrx plays that clip that well without having to resort to XvBA).
            And yeah, that FireFox issue has been driving me nuts. Good thing I have been moving to Chrome.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Melcar View Post
              With KMS?
              No, I'm still running UMS until I get a legitimate reason to run KMS.

              Comment


              • #8
                Now we're waiting for some tests UMS vs KMS on Radeon cards R300-R700.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I did a small 2D test a while ago with my 200M. Been meaning to do one with my HD4850, but the damn thing takes so long to finish . Will cook up one for Xv as well latter this week.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thanks Melcar. Unfortunately it doesn't look too optimistic for KMS (yet). I thought that now the performance of KMS with R300-R500 will be at least as good as UMS/non-KMS.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X