Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Allwinner A80 Octa-Core Hardware Coming Next Month

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,906

    Default Allwinner A80 Octa-Core Hardware Coming Next Month

    Phoronix: Allwinner A80 Octa-Core Hardware Coming Next Month

    In June we should start seeing the Allwinner A80-based hardware designs hitting the market for a much needed performance boost for Allwinner SoCs...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTY4MjE

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    43

    Default

    As an owner of several Chinese tablets using the Allwinner and other chipets, they are slow. They might have the clock speed and the cores and the instruction set, but the IPC is low. THat combined with REALLY slow NAND storage makes the whole unit feel sluggish.

    Don't get me wrong, it'll play 1080p and all that stuff fine (mostly, most codecs) but switching between apps, launching new apps etc is dog slow. But, that's why they are cheap. So, I don't hold much hope for this one other than, hey, it's nice to see improvements.

    I know I won't be picking up any more Chinese tablets anyway. Nexus are too cheap.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    221

    Default

    What's the difference? They're all made there, all using variations of Arm CPUs. I suspect RAM and the flash storage have more to do with application switching performance than CPU speed anyway.

    But an octa-core with the performance of a quad-core. Doesn't deserve the name.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11

    Default

    With a quad a15 (the fastest ARM designed core available) and a pretty beefy GPU, this may be Allwinner trying to move up from the budget end? All their previous chips were bargin-basement CPUs, so this is a big change.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jonnyh View Post
    With a quad a15 (the fastest ARM designed core available) and a pretty beefy GPU, this may be Allwinner trying to move up from the budget end? All their previous chips were bargin-basement CPUs, so this is a big change.
    It's one thing to honour the instruction set etc, anotherthing to be fast. The allwinner were never fast, at all. Like I said before, the whole tablet experience is going to suck unless you've got fast RAM and NAND as well.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,118

    Default

    "Making the Allwinner A80 more appealing too is that its graphics are upgraded to the PowerVR G6230."

    Uh WUT.....

    have you been smoking?



    SERIOUSLY!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    "Making the Allwinner A80 more appealing too is that its graphics are upgraded to the PowerVR G6230."

    Uh WUT.....

    have you been smoking?



    SERIOUSLY!!!
    What a worthless comment. Wish I could make it so I never have to see your comments again.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3

    Default

    @Cyborg16

    I can see why you might think that, but the main difference in this SoC configuration is that all 8 cores can run at the same time, whereas other bigLITTLE configurations haven't allowed for this. Hence the reason they are advertising this as 8 core, and the first of it's kind. Though I suspect we'll see others soon.

    Having all 8 cores able to run at the same time, rather than just switching from a15/a7 should provide significant performance boosts.


    Quote Originally Posted by Cyborg16 View Post
    What's the difference? They're all made there, all using variations of Arm CPUs. I suspect RAM and the flash storage have more to do with application switching performance than CPU speed anyway.

    But an octa-core with the performance of a quad-core. Doesn't deserve the name.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    Ignore list man, ignore list.

    Though I agree with him on this one, Mali has better prospects with good open drivers than anything PowerVR.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7

    Default Where there is smoke, therse fire

    PowerVR. Burn it with fire. And don't inhale

    While the PowerVR delivers power there is little hope for contiguous usage, even Intel couldn't cope with it. Driver development is left to the final vendor. Imagination is hopeless. Their Marketing proved it once again:
    http://www.cnx-software.com/2014/02/...rvr-g6230-gpu/

    I wished they'd licensed something like an ARM Mali, Vivante GC, Quallcomm Ardreno, NVIDIA SoC GPU. All with some binary contiguously and hopes for free (mainline) drivers.

    There might be hope, as for the A23, which was released after the A31 (PowerVR), again a Mali GPU was used.

    The A23 seems more of an iteration of the A31 than A20 looking at the messages on the linux-sunxi mailinglist

    So let's hope for a next one with Mali.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •