Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 174

Thread: Installing latest Open Source ATI drivers under Ubuntu 8.04

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,385

    Default

    Depends which driver you are talking about.

    On radeon the 3d support is fully integrated and co-exists with 2d / video acceleration. On radeonhd the same acceleration code is available in the quick & dirty 2d accel branch which should get merged to master pretty soon (maybe today).

    I haven't looked at the wiki today but I wouldn't be surprised if 3d is still flagged as "experimental" because of the 2d/3d co-existence issue, but that will go away as soon as the q&d accel branch is merged.

    I think you're talking about radeonhd from the quote, so if you download and build again as soon as the q&d accel branch gets merged the restrictions should go away.

    Note that you also need pretty current mesa (7.1RC3 or higher) and drm code to get full 3d accel on a 5xx, and unrelated changes in mesa also require a new X server in order to keep AIGLX working.

    The good news is that the combination should run pretty nicely, and EXA 2D performance seems to be real good in conjuction with the glyph cache improvements in a 1.5-ish X server.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    On radeonhd the same acceleration code is available in the quick & dirty 2d accel branch which should get merged to master pretty soon (maybe today).
    I love you guys

    Can you already say when the HDMI-Audio/CS/atombios_support-branches will get merged? And what exactly does the atombios_support-branch do anyway? Is it a rewrite of existing functions using AtomBIOS, does it include anything new using AtomBIOS or is it just code to make RadeonHD capable of using AtomBIOS at all?

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,385

    Default

    Still under discussion but we should be able to say more in a week or so.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    343

    Default

    The radeonhd driver in the xorg-edgers package archive got an update today, with major changes. From what I can see the quick_and_dirty_2d branch was merged into master. If you want to test it with the live CD script, edit the script to install the radeonhd package, or just install it afterwards and log in and out to restart X.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tormod View Post
    The radeonhd driver in the xorg-edgers package archive got an update today, with major changes. From what I can see the quick_and_dirty_2d branch was merged into master. If you want to test it with the live CD script, edit the script to install the radeonhd package, or just install it afterwards and log in and out to restart X.
    Hi tormod,

    you seem to have success building the latest RadeonHD code. Do you why it doesn't work for me and "bugmenot" - was there any new dependencies needed?

    >>> http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showp...9&postcount=13

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,385

    Default

    I forget the details but the new code picks up drm headers from a different place (probably the drm tree) than before. There was also an issue reported overnight where if you build without DRI you get an error -- building with DRI gets around that for now.

    If you follow d2kx's link you end up here, where there is info on getting around the build issues. Basically requires bringing down more packages because radeonhd now has a build dependency on drm if building with dri enabled :

    http://radeonhd.org/index.php?page=a...08-7-26#result

    The nice thing is that radeonhd now picks up full EXA render and textured video and you no longer have to choose between 2d/video and 3d acceleration. If you run EXA with a new X server you should also see a decent 2d performance boost.
    Last edited by bridgman; 07-26-2008 at 11:49 AM.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    21

    Default

    I've followed the steps but when i execute glxinfo i only have this message:

    jesus@tux-CT:~$ glxinfo
    name of display: :0.0
    Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig

    EDITED
    Ok, solved but i can't use kde4 effects.....so backing to fglrx...
    Last edited by Fenix-TX; 07-27-2008 at 09:42 AM.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Hi tormod,

    you seem to have success building the latest RadeonHD code. Do you why it doesn't work for me and "bugmenot" - was there any new dependencies needed?
    There are no secrets I document all changes to the original Debian packaging in the changelogs, which you can browse on the PPA page.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benitoa View Post
    libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib/dri/r200_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/r200_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context)
    libGL error: unable to load driver: r200_dri.so[/B]
    Hi,
    i'm fixed this by removing /usr/lib/xorg/libGL.so.1.2 and making symlink to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 instead. dpkg -S dont know anything about /usr/lib/xorg/libGL.so.1.2 so think it's just trash file. May be part of fglrx or old mesa(i'm using 7.10 updated to 8.04). Hope this can help.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cobold View Post
    Hi,
    i'm fixed this by removing /usr/lib/xorg/libGL.so.1.2 and making symlink to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 instead. dpkg -S dont know anything about /usr/lib/xorg/libGL.so.1.2 so think it's just trash file. May be part of fglrx or old mesa(i'm using 7.10 updated to 8.04). Hope this can help.
    I also had a diversion that stuck around from the old fglrx, so the new libs weren't being read. Try doing "dpkg-divert --list" in a terminal and look for any libGL that shouldn't be there. Also, try using "sudo updatedb" followed by "locate libGL" to list all the versions. If one looks to be wrong, you can use "dpkg -S <file name>" to determine which package it's a part of. Then uninstall that package and reinstall tormod's versions.

    hth

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •