Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: AMD Catalyst 14.4 On Linux With Radeon R3 APU Graphics

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,371

    Default AMD Catalyst 14.4 On Linux With Radeon R3 APU Graphics

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst 14.4 On Linux With Radeon R3 APU Graphics

    Tested yesterday at Phoronix was the AMD Catalyst 14.4 Linux performance where several newer, high-end graphics cards were tested from a Core i7 Haswell system. With that hardware, there was little in the way of OpenGL performance changes except for a couple of tests. Several Phoronix readers expressed interest in Catalyst 14.4 AMD AM1 APU tests in seeing if there are any improvements for the new APUs with Radeon R3 Graphics or performance improvements in general out of Catalyst 14.4 for reduced OpenGL overhead on lower-end processors. In this article are Catalyst 14.3 vs. 14.4 Ubuntu Linux benchmarks with an AMD Athlon 5350.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=20279

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    342

    Default

    I honestly want to see more Intel Iris 5200 graphics benchmarks thrown in. That thing is a beast, and would put shame to the Radeon HD 8400.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    I honestly want to see more Intel Iris 5200 graphics benchmarks thrown in. That thing is a beast, and would put shame to the Radeon HD 8400.
    If only I had a 5200 system...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    If only I had a 5200 system...
    To both Michael and the original poster, I heard that with Broadwell the "Iris Pro" (aka eDRAM) tech is coming to desktop processors to help compete with AMD APU's. So benchmarks might be possible then, price allowing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    I honestly want to see more Intel Iris 5200 graphics benchmarks thrown in. That thing is a beast, and would put shame to the Radeon HD 8400.
    What is the lowest price for the CPU with Iris Pro 5200? i5-4570R maybe? That is not anywhere near 50 pricetag, nor wattage usage of Athlon 5350... i5-4570R maybe i think is nearly comparabile with A10-7850K with performace per watt/cost . A10-7850K need more watts - but cost less, i5-4570R slighly better performant and need less watts - but costs more .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Porto
    Posts
    149

    Default nops

    Quote Originally Posted by dungeon View Post
    What is the lowest price for the CPU with Iris Pro 5200? i5-4570R maybe? That is not anywhere near 50 pricetag, nor wattage usage of Athlon 5350... i5-4570R maybe i think is nearly comparabile with A10-7850K with performace per watt/cost . A10-7850K need more watts - but cost less, i5-4570R slighly better performant and need less watts - but costs more .
    intel hd 5200 only exist in few mobile cpus.. is the best igpu in the market but to expensive

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dungeon View Post
    What is the lowest price for the CPU with Iris Pro 5200? i5-4570R maybe? That is not anywhere near 50 pricetag, nor wattage usage of Athlon 5350... i5-4570R maybe i think is nearly comparabile with A10-7850K with performace per watt/cost . A10-7850K need more watts - but cost less, i5-4570R slighly better performant and need less watts - but costs more .
    Yet chineses was doing 2 months ago just that benchmark , Brix with i5-4570R vs A10-7850K:

    http://www.4gamer.net/games/999/G999902/20140208005/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    I honestly want to see more Intel Iris 5200 graphics benchmarks thrown in. That thing is a beast, and would put shame to the Radeon HD 8400.
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/7648/gigabyte-brix-pro

    A system with that chip(excluding memory and storage) costs twice as much as a potential AM1 PC(with memory and storage). Not to mention that it probably has higher power consumption.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •