Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ASUS AM1I-A: A Mini-ITX Board For Socketed Kabini APUs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by AJSB View Post
    Here it is:

    From PCIe 1.1 to 3.0 and from 4 lane to 16 lane:

    Today's latest graphics cards come with support for PCI-Express 3.0, which promises twice the bandwidth, while still being compatible with older motherboards and graphics cards. In our article we analyze differences in PCIe performance on Intel's Ivy Bridge with GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon HD 7970, using 20 games at five resolutions, each at all three PCIe generations and x4, x8 and x16 link width.
    It's not surprising that it scales well if the link is mostly used for submitting commands. It would be more interesting to know how loads scale that involve lots of transfers. E.g. 2D rendering or VRAM-heavy rendering that exceeds physical VRAM capacity.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by brent View Post
      It's not surprising that it scales well if the link is mostly used for submitting commands. It would be more interesting to know how loads scale that involve lots of transfers. E.g. 2D rendering or VRAM-heavy rendering that exceeds physical VRAM capacity.
      It also transfers textures but they are not affected by game resolution...and with many modern games not having actually that good textures and rely in many GPU-boundtechniques to increase the perceived image "quality", most of the work is done by GPU...except in some games that are CPU-bound to do some post-processing in image in the CPU itself....the article talks about one of those games, luckly , those are rare cases nowadays....

      Comment

      Working...
      X