So these results are way better than the earlier ones for the 5350 and much more like they should be. So what was the problem with the earlier numbers? While I understand the issues with DPM for the gpu tests, the cpu results also look like the cores were stuck at 800Mhz or something when comparing the numbers (in the multithreaded tests the "old" 5350 ends up roughly where the sempron 2650 now does which would support that theory). Was that a testing error or do you really need 3.14 kernel for it to work?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Athlon 5350 / 5150 & Sempron 3850 / 2650
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Michael View PostUnlikely, too time consuming, etc, unless there were requests from many Phoronix Premium readers for that... besides the overclocking is limited and just getting about an extra 100MHz if lucky.
...but a GTX750(Ti) is/was tested, right ?
As for OC, it seems that the 5350 can go up 156MHz more in total for CPU....
Comment
-
Originally posted by mczak View PostSo these results are way better than the earlier ones for the 5350 and much more like they should be. So what was the problem with the earlier numbers? While I understand the issues with DPM for the gpu tests, the cpu results also look like the cores were stuck at 800Mhz or something when comparing the numbers (in the multithreaded tests the "old" 5350 ends up roughly where the sempron 2650 now does which would support that theory). Was that a testing error or do you really need 3.14 kernel for it to work?
I am using it right now with 3.13 kernel no problem, and performance is like you see in this article i even overclocked it to 2206 MHz and it works fine .Last edited by dungeon; 14 April 2014, 02:48 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostFrom my testing with AM1M-A and Athlon 5350 with Lubuntu 14.04 and Debian Sid kernel 3.14 is not explicitly needed , so xUbuntu users can stay with default kernel and default mesa, etc... but they have to tweak few settings: radeon.dpm=1 as kernel parameter and ColorTiling together with ColorTiling2D in xorg.conf - that way performance is roughly the same like you see in this article .
I am using it right now with 3.13 kernel no problem, and performance is like you see in this article i even overclocked it to 2206 MHz and it works fine .Last edited by dungeon; 14 April 2014, 03:48 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon;but they have to tweak few settings: radeon.dpm=1 as kernel parameter and ColorTiling together with ColorTiling2D in xorg.confOriginally posted by dungeon View PostAs for the first testing article he did, i think Michael does not apply these tweaks and maybe it set something wrongly in bios - maybe silent mode/power saving preset or something similar - that could easely explain low results .
Comment
-
Originally posted by smitty3268 View PostThose settings should only affect graphics - and i'm sure they were the problem in his gpu tests. But they shouldn't have any effect on the cpu-only tests, which were also much slower than expected.
He maybe enable silent mode which triger the issue there or something, who knows Governior is also setted to performance earlier as i see, but now he testing it with ondemand which is default, etc.
Comment
Comment