Page 3 of 25 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 248

Thread: The GNOME Foundation Is Running Short On Money

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Donated a bit. Some of my friends and family rock Gnome 3.x and love it.

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jern View Post
    1) Inclusion has for a long time been a public value of the GNOME project. Think of the strong consideration for a11y.
    That's just a buzzword.

    If GNOME wants my money, then let them justify their little social justice projects, which frankly aren't even necessary and will not be successful.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Kde was the default desktop. Gnome has just created fragmentation, with the dishonestly name Unity, Mate, Cinnamon lxde xfce etc. We need convergence: one default display server, one window manager, one desktop, one office suite, one init system, one package manager, one file manger.

    If we could get Linux up out of the 1-2% then we could support numerous minority options and choices, but there needs to be one coherent, properly tested default distro that new users, hardware manufacturers and application developers can focus on.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich Oliver View Post
    Kde was the default desktop. Gnome has just created fragmentation, with the dishonestly name Unity, Mate, Cinnamon lxde xfce etc. We need convergence: one default display server, one window manager, one desktop, one office suite, one init system, one package manager, one file manger.

    If we could get Linux up out of the 1-2% then we could support numerous minority options and choices, but there needs to be one coherent, properly tested default distro that new users, hardware manufacturers and application developers can focus on.
    Utopia

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich Oliver View Post
    We need convergence: one default display server,
    Which will be Wayland.
    one window manager,
    Of course you mean the i3 WM in conjunction with Compton (at least until i3 gets its own compositing), am I right?
    one desktop,
    no one needs that, so we can happily dismiss that to get more resources for other things.
    one office suite,
    I guess you are fine with Calligra, aren't you?
    one init system,
    Sure, let's go for SystemV init with BSD style scripts, or maybe something like OpenRC.
    one package manager,
    Slackware's pkgtools are just fine and easy to work with, let's go for that.
    one file manger.
    OK, I vote for Ranger.

    Oh, I guess that isn't what you wanted, of course those "standard" things should be the ones you want to use, am I right?

    It is rather simple to get what you describe: Switch to Windows or OS X. I take my Linux as it is already: Free choice for everyone, no forced "standards".
    And I support the projects that I like. I couldn't care less about Gnome's Shell design, I don't use it. What I care about is their attitude: Don't listen to your users, don't listen to the developers that also use "your" toolkit, ... .

    They want money? Easy, fix your problems, become a more attractive project, the money will come almost automatically.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSDude View Post
    Utopia
    how is that utopia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia

    it would kill choice, not to mention projects on a holocaust level... unless mass murder is the road to paradise, lol

    as far as system level choices go, it would be good. and this part is already in progress with systemd and wayland (and probably btrfs as default file system)
    now...
    - how would distro like gentoo use same package manager as the rest?
    - so you either enforce one "does all" or "lacking features" office on everyone?
    - window manager... just for appetizer. which one do you enforce tiling or non tiling?
    - desktop? kde which has too many features, gnome which has too few, cinnamon which lacks apps,...

    all but basic system level would much better be served in common specs, where not one party is deviating away unless it 100% supports spec as standalone which was agreed by all contenders... in short freedesktop which actually acts as one instead of free dumping ground as fdo is

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike_ludkips View Post
    I want to support free software, not social justice politics.
    I think you are confused. What you want is probably to support "open source", not "free software". It is a known fact that free software activists (first among them RMS) consider free software a social movement standing for a given set of ethical and social values.

    Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement. This is precisely the defining difference between the two. From then GNU website:

    The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success.
    The political agenda against free software of this blog being known, I am not surprised by the tone of most comment here. I'm sorry for so few people standing for free software, but I don't think there's anything inherently bad with their feeling (reading them doesn't affect my level of "hope")... we are still better off with open source enthusiasts disagreeing with us but making free software more visible than being alone.

    As for Gnome: I love it and it perfectly meets my needs as a programmer who need a reliable, snappy, versatile environment with no frills added (but with more functionality than Xmonad)... I am very happy they follow their vision rather than conforming to users' wishes, as that exposed me to something I would not have imagined myself. That said, their programmers would most certainly benefit from some more "style" in communicating with the community at large.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike_ludkips View Post
    While I love free software, I'm afraid it's best if we hold off.

    I will be refraining from donating until GNOME:

    A) Renounce these social justice campaigns as peripheral and unnecessary
    B) Promise to not hijack the organization for peripheral and unnecessary endeavors in future

    I want to support free software, not social justice politics.
    I think you'll find the GNU has always been a social justice movement. Go back to reddit MRA and have a nice circlejerk dude.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lolnope View Post
    I think I'll donate 25% of my salary to gnome when I get a job next month
    Wow, great!

    One of the things to consider though is dependability.
    Donations, even huge ones, are often one-time incomes. In order to do a proper budget and respective planning, more stable forms of income are preferable, e.g. in case of GNOME joining the Friends of GNOME program.

    A momentary increase in donations will resolve the current crisis more quickly.
    An increase in FoG members will improve the situation in the long run, i.e. making it less likely that such a crisis will happen again.

    Basically the "give a man a fish" principle.

    Cheers,
    _

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Why donate money?
    gnome is a redhat business so they can give them some money They gain hundred of million each year, they are a big multinational company and then they ask poor users for donation!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •