Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: ACPI, Power Management Get Big Linux 3.13 Updates

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,133

    Default ACPI, Power Management Get Big Linux 3.13 Updates

    Phoronix: ACPI, Power Management Get Big Linux 3.13 Updates

    The Linux 3.13 kernel merge window has become even more exciting even though it's not even officially open yet. Besides many to-be-merged changes talked about on Phoronix already, the ACPI and power management pull is particularly exciting for ARM and Intel Linux users...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTUwODA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default APUs need more love

    I'd really like to see better power management for APUs. I have a little HP DM1Z running an E2-1800 processor and it runs slow and hot even under XFCE which is suppose to be lighter on ressources. Meanwhile it runs really well in Windows which tells me it's not some dusty fan problem causing throttling. Granted my distro isn't on the latest kernel, but currently using 3.8 but still. A lot of improvements are still needed to these types of processors which are rapidly becoming the dominant processor for mainstream computing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    221

    Default use kernel 3.12

    Quote Originally Posted by mithion View Post
    I'd really like to see better power management for APUs. I have a little HP DM1Z running an E2-1800 processor and it runs slow and hot even under XFCE which is suppose to be lighter on ressources. Meanwhile it runs really well in Windows which tells me it's not some dusty fan problem causing throttling. Granted my distro isn't on the latest kernel, but currently using 3.8 but still. A lot of improvements are still needed to these types of processors which are rapidly becoming the dominant processor for mainstream computing.
    use kernel 3.12 with dpm

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mithion View Post
    I'd really like to see better power management for APUs. I have a little HP DM1Z running an E2-1800 processor and it runs slow and hot even under XFCE which is suppose to be lighter on ressources. Meanwhile it runs really well in Windows which tells me it's not some dusty fan problem causing throttling. Granted my distro isn't on the latest kernel, but currently using 3.8 but still. A lot of improvements are still needed to these types of processors which are rapidly becoming the dominant processor for mainstream computing.
    You need at least kernel 3.11 plus radeon.dpm=1 boot option for dynamic power management.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    Hey, what could be worse than a two minute edit limit ?

    A ONE MINUTE EDIT LIMIT. AUGGH !!!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    I recently discovered the timer slack controller for timers and really don't understand why this isn't made use of. Systemd has an interface for it (you can change timer slack in /etc/systemd/system.conf), logind is made aware of system state changes but there's no way that I've found to dynamically change the timer slack based on system state. By default timer slack is left unset.
    The reason I bring this up is b/c timer slack is supposed to have the effect of allowing timer-based events to wakeup less precisely which enables the scheduler to coalesce the events into fewer wakeup period thus reducing the number of times the cpu would have to exit its low power states.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Hey, what could be worse than a two minute edit limit ?

    A ONE MINUTE EDIT LIMIT. AUGGH !!!!!
    I feel your pain Bridgman -_- Michael i like the new font and texting styling, it looks a lot nicer. But the one minute edit delay is a big No-No

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    84

    Default

    For the ULV Haswell and Bay Trail chips, does the Intel P-State driver also tell the CPU to go into the new S0ix active idle state when idle? This new state is being touted as the main reason why ULV Haswell, Clover Trail and Bay Trail based Windows 8 devices get noticeably longer battery life compared to older ULV chips.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    221

    Default pstate :/

    Quote Originally Posted by guido12 View Post
    For the ULV Haswell and Bay Trail chips, does the Intel P-State driver also tell the CPU to go into the new S0ix active idle state when idle? This new state is being touted as the main reason why ULV Haswell, Clover Trail and Bay Trail based Windows 8 devices get noticeably longer battery life compared to older ULV chips.
    i have a ulv ivy and p-state is really bad for battery life i don t know about haswell, i never see my cpu in 800 mhz (minimal) even in idle, because of this i disable p.state

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrecorreia View Post
    i have a ulv ivy and p-state is really bad for battery life i don t know about haswell, i never see my cpu in 800 mhz (minimal) even in idle, because of this i disable p.state
    When P-States are enabled, the CPU-frequency does correlate to power use directly (i.e. you should not pay attention to CPU frequency to determine power usage). To tell whether P-States are working correctly use powertop and check that the cores are in C7 state most of the time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •