Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Debian Developers Release APT 1.0

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,645

    Default Debian Developers Release APT 1.0

    Phoronix: Debian Developers Release APT 1.0

    Debian developers announced this week version 1.0 of APT, their Advanced Packaging Tool, on the day that the packaging project turned sixteen years old...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTY1NTA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    210

    Default

    I hope this new apt binary is as easy to use as archlinux pacman. Unifiying the apt ecosystem is a good move. I moved from xubuntu to archlinux because of the outdated software, upgrades and ppa which was sickening me. Maybe some time on the future I will come back to a debian based distro, but for now arch (installed with Antergos) is so stable and updated that I dont have complains. Pacman is even faster than apt and the arch user repository is a dream.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    830

    Default

    I never felt that apt is a particularly good package manager. For something that is suposed to be used in a terminal it does a pretty shitty job producing readable output. Compare that to yum or pacman, where everything is presented in a nice tabular view and every action only takes up one line and has a progressbar. Also never figured out why it can't be just apt install <something>, why does it need so many different commands? Debian repos are also just horrible. Just look at how many directories and files make up a debian repo. It could be as simple as just having one folder per architecture per repo containing the packages and one database file like on Arch. You can't make packaging anymore complicated than on Debian.
    Last edited by blackout23; 04-04-2014 at 12:50 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    I never felt that apt is a particularly good package manager. For something that is suposed to be used in a terminal it does a pretty shitty job producing readable output. Compare that to yum or pacman, where everything is presented in a nice tabular view and every action only takes up one line and has a progressbar. Also never figured out why it can't be just apt install <something>, why does it need so many different commands? Debian repos are also just horrible. Just look at how many directories and files make up a debian repo. It could be as simple as just having one folder per architecture per repo containing the packages and one database file like on Arch. You can't make packaging anymore complicated than on Debian.
    It's apt-get install <something>

    Also, you are confusing apt, the manager with apt-get, one of several frontends. Many people prefer aptitude, a different frontend.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Anybody using Linux Mint has been using just the "apt" command for a while now
    They write a bash script to wrap the common uses of apt-get and apt-cache

    Some examples: "apt install <package>" == "apt-get install <package>" and "apt search <package>" == "apt-cache search <package>"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daktyl198 View Post
    Anybody using Linux Mint has been using just the "apt" command for a while now
    They write a bash script to wrap the common uses of apt-get and apt-cache

    Some examples: "apt install <package>" == "apt-get install <package>" and "apt search <package>" == "apt-cache search <package>"
    Didn't know that, thanks. My experience with Mint was only fleeting.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Code:
    $ apt-get moo
             (__) 
             (oo) 
       /------\/ 
      / |    ||   
     *  /\---/\ 
        ~~   ~~   
    ...."Have you mooed today?"...
    I gotta admit I haven't used pacman, but.. for me, apt and aptitude are GREAT package managers. It is true that sometimes the output is a bit cryptic (when things break, for example), but once you learn how to manage things, everything "just works" as it should.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,195

    Default

    Does it support SHA-3?
    Or it uses MD5 or some shit?

    How good is the SAT dependency solver?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    One really nasty bug: It doesn't work right with captive portals.

    Maybe switching to ssl or or signing works around this problem.
    Last edited by dibal; 04-04-2014 at 03:59 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dibal View Post
    One really nasty bug: It doesn't work right with captive portals.

    Maybe switching to ssl or or signing works around this problem.
    I cannot edit: Maybe switching to ssl or or signing the package list works around this problem.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •