Unless there's a huge performance win in having FS-level encryption - I fail to see why *any* FS should have its own encryption support.
Originally Posted by Pajn
Instead of solving security and performance issues in one layer (dm-crypt) you are now forced to solve the same (?) issue across different FS' (ext4-crypt, btrfs-crypt, etc).
Granted, all FS' can share the same crypto code and implement it differently on disk - but this will be more-or-less the same as improving dm-crypt (which in the case of btrfs COW, may be a hard requirement).
DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB, GTX680, F20/x86_64, Dell U2711.
SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F20/x86_64, Dell U2412..
BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F20/x86-64.
LAP: ASUS N56VJ, i7-3630QM, 16GB, 1TB, 635M, F20/x86_64.