Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Enlightenment 0.19 Lands Full Wayland Support, Its Own Compositor

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,435

    Default Enlightenment 0.19 Lands Full Wayland Support, Its Own Compositor

    Phoronix: Enlightenment 0.19 Lands Full Wayland Support, Its Own Compositor

    As expected the Enlightenment 0.19 release features full support for Wayland, down to serving as its own compositor and running directly off the DRM graphics device...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYzNDY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    23

    Default Corrections

    Ok, before all the speculation and misinformation starts, let me clear up some things and make some corrections to this article...

    The stuff that got pushed today is for running Enlightenment without X11. It renders using it's own Wayland compositor. When built without X support, the compositor will render using DRM. What is mentioned in the article about being "full" needs some clarification.

    First, this is full Wayland support (meaning it supports everything that current wayland supports, minus xdg-shell which is coming).

    What is is NOT is Full Enlightenment support (meaning that some Enlightenment features do not function yet...some Enlightenment modules may not load, or may not function 100%).

    The bugs I mentioned in the Readme are Not bugs with the Wayland implementation. They are bugs concerning the running of Enlightenment itself in a wayland only setup.

    With regard to the XWayland portion of this article ... I do already have code for that, it's just not pushed to git yet

    And by the way, the name is Chris Michael .. Not Chris Michaels

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devilhorns View Post
    Ok, before all the speculation and misinformation starts, let me clear up some things and make some corrections to this article...

    The stuff that got pushed today is for running Enlightenment without X11. It renders using it's own Wayland compositor. When built without X support, the compositor will render using DRM. What is mentioned in the article about being "full" needs some clarification.

    First, this is full Wayland support (meaning it supports everything that current wayland supports, minus xdg-shell which is coming).

    What is is NOT is Full Enlightenment support (meaning that some Enlightenment features do not function yet...some Enlightenment modules may not load, or may not function 100%).

    The bugs I mentioned in the Readme are Not bugs with the Wayland implementation. They are bugs concerning the running of Enlightenment itself in a wayland only setup.

    With regard to the XWayland portion of this article ... I do already have code for that, it's just not pushed to git yet

    And by the way, the name is Chris Michael .. Not Chris Michaels
    Thanks for the clarifications, updated.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    23

    Default Thank You

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    Thanks for the clarifications, updated.
    Thank you Michael for the fixes Was not trying to complain, as I appreciate the post, just wanted to be sure it's an accurate one. Cheers

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devilhorns View Post
    Thank you Michael for the fixes Was not trying to complain, as I appreciate the post, just wanted to be sure it's an accurate one. Cheers
    Right, thanks, feedback/clarifications is appreciated when tirelessly writing so many articles everyday on so many topics

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    245

    Default

    This is very good news and I appreciate the effort of all those involved. I shall look to install it this weekend to give it a whirl, I don't mind the lack of features / instability as I have limited use cases.

    What I was wondering is how much Weston is involved in this? I understand that a lot of Wayland-based stuff basically piggy-backs Weston at the minute. Is Weston a dependency, or is some code taken from Weston, or is this completely independent of Weston?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kaprikawn View Post
    This is very good news and I appreciate the effort of all those involved. I shall look to install it this weekend to give it a whirl, I don't mind the lack of features / instability as I have limited use cases.

    What I was wondering is how much Weston is involved in this? I understand that a lot of Wayland-based stuff basically piggy-backs Weston at the minute. Is Weston a dependency, or is some code taken from Weston, or is this completely independent of Weston?
    There is Zero (0, none) Weston involved here. Weston is Not a dependency for this, this is completely 100% independent. The only requirement is the Wayland libraries (in that regard).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kaprikawn View Post
    What I was wondering is how much Weston is involved in this?
    Weston is an example compositor, showing how to use Wayland and allowing testing. This replaces it with E's own compositor.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    469

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devilhorns View Post
    And by the way, the name is Chris Michael .. Not Chris Michaels
    Wait, a pro wrestler is writing E19?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •