Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Radeon X.Org Driver Can Now Build Against The New GLAMOR

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,702

    Default Radeon X.Org Driver Can Now Build Against The New GLAMOR

    Phoronix: Radeon X.Org Driver Can Now Build Against The New GLAMOR

    The xf86-video-ati DDX driver is now able to build against the in-tree GLAMOR code found within the X.Org Server 1.16 code-base...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYzMjk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    79

    Default Debian?

    I assume this is the direction Julien is headed for Debian Jessie and this is why he didn't go with Glamor support so far?

    Trying to read tea leaves here. Hopefully we'll see official Glamor support soon...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    29

    Default Better the EXA must be proven

    On HD 5000 and 6000 Redwood series was better EXA. What is advantage of GLAMOR indeed? Will it be better choice for next X.Org and video-ati for Redwood as well as for Islands? I hope so. Keep testing, Michael!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjezek View Post
    On HD 5000 and 6000 Redwood series was better EXA. What is advantage of GLAMOR indeed? Will it be better choice for next X.Org and video-ati for Redwood as well as for Islands? I hope so. Keep testing, Michael!
    Since all modern video cards support OpenGL, why not reuse that support for a DDX? The answer is glamor. Instead of creating a seperate driver specifically for X, they can use OpenGL which is used by a lot of other things. So no more time 'wasted' for specifically supporting X once glamor is used.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,942

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjezek View Post
    On HD 5000 and 6000 Redwood series was better EXA. What is advantage of GLAMOR indeed? Will it be better choice for next X.Org and video-ati for Redwood as well as for Islands? i hope so. Keep testing, Michael!
    Glamor right now is pretty unoptimized, but Eric over at Intel is very hopeful. He's hopeful to the point that he considers the handtuned SNA to be 'pretty good' but believes that they can get GLAMOR to be even better than SNA

  6. #6

    Default

    I run glamor on Trinity/Richland chips (6xxx series based IGPs) and its pretty much the same as exa with xfce4 (no compositing) in actual usage. There are some slower things such as libreoffice calc in some circumstances.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toulouse (France)
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rrohbeck View Post
    I assume this is the direction Julien is headed for Debian Jessie and this is why he didn't go with Glamor support so far?

    Trying to read tea leaves here. Hopefully we'll see official Glamor support soon...
    That's why I installed Kanotix packages... I replaced a hd6770 that burned, but a 7850 and then had no 3D at all !

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jery View Post
    That's why I installed Kanotix packages... I replaced a hd6770 that burned, but a 7850 and then had no 3D at all !
    I build glamor-egl from debian-x and xserver-xorg-driver-ati from the standard source but with --enable-glamor. Not a big deal, just a bit annoying.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •