Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: 6-Way Linux Desktop 2D/3D Performance Comparison On Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Wait, what? Now it is the fault of KDE developers when Ubuntu maintainers choose defaults that are not sane, because they are guiding them not enough? Are you kidding or should this be a serious comment?
    Seriously? Did you even read the comments in this thread, were clearly was pointed out that Michael once again has not enabled un-redirecting for fullscreen rendering? Do you see the short test from siavashserver that clearly shows that there is no performance difference between KDE and XFCE if you enable that option? And how about the countless posts for every DE benchmark Michael delivers, where exactly this is pointed out?
    Talk about nonconstructive again.
    The headline of the article specifically mentions the benchmark is performed under Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. The point is not to make a particular DE look pretty, but to show what a person installing Ubuntu with the chosen DE can expect. So please tell us, why Michael should fiddle with some obscure settings, which would be unknown to most users before making his benchmarks?

    I see many other constructive posts here, presenting data and narrowing down issues based on Michaels benchmark - moving the world forward. If you believe there is a bug in Ubuntu, you could probably have posted it in Launchpad in less time than spent making derogatory posts here about Michael, Ubuntu and whoever.

    I do not expect any constructive or respectful answer from you - so have a nice life...
    Last edited by Veto; 03-12-2014 at 06:13 PM.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2

    Default KDE

    So this basically tells me that KDE sucks on Ubuntu.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by razaccour View Post
    So this basically tells me that KDE sucks on Ubuntu.
    Not really. It basically tells you that Ubuntu's KDE maintainers suck. As you can see, if you use sane settings it is fast as the other DEs.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2

    Default It is what it Is

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    Not really. It basically tells you that Ubuntu's KDE maintainers suck. As you can see, if you use sane settings it is fast as the other DEs.
    I'm not playing the blame game saying it's KDE devs fault. To the user it doesn't matter who's to blame, it is what it is. I agree with you though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •