Google Replacing GTK2 With Aura In Chrome 35
Phoronix: Google Replacing GTK2 With Aura In Chrome 35
Google will finally be migrating from GTK2 to their own Aura UI code with a target of Chrome/Chromium 35...
Google created AURA as an replacement for GTK, no problem with the community. what would have happened if we had replaced "google" with "canonical"?
Last edited by edoantonioco; 03-11-2014 at 10:26 PM.
Canonical would never support all those platforms. Canonical only rebrands software, adding minor modifications instead of attempting to work with upstream, thus creating fragmentation that they could have easily prevented.
Originally Posted by edoantonioco
I wouldn't be surprised if Canonical found a use for AURA, rebrands it and attempts to label it as some brand new, never before seen, nothing even comes close to it, etc. etc. etc. software. Google would be a tough upstream to go against though.
Last edited by Ouroboros; 03-11-2014 at 10:34 PM.
You're comparing apples to oranges. Canonical doesn't have any cross platform native applications, so why would they need to support multiple platforms?
Originally Posted by Ouroboros
I was replying to edoantonioco, who asked "what would have happened if we had replaced "google" with "canonical"?"
Originally Posted by chrisb
I was simply trying to say that Canonical wouldn't support as many platforms if they were the original AURA developers, nor would they actually use their resources to create a project from scratch in the first place when they can just rebrand others', make small modifications and call it their own.
Canonical solution = Fork, rebrand, make small modifications, advertise as being significantly superior to the original in every way.
How about we switch Canonical's name with Microsoft. There would be thousands of people lining up to chant Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.
Originally Posted by chrisb
Google is only doing something to a single application, one which they have made from scratch (well, minus the webkit stuff) without major 3rd party contributions. Canonical, on the other hand, controls an entire distribution and all the applications it ships with. And most of those are from 3rd parties. So i really don't see the comparison here at all. That's the apples and oranges.
Last edited by smitty3268; 03-12-2014 at 02:52 AM.
Well, this isn't true. They've used the webkit browser engine, and in a browser the browser engine is definitely the most difficult part to write (indeed no one writes new browser engines, even Apple didn't do their own thing and used KHTML. Only recently Mozilla has started Servo, but it's still in its early stages). So you can't say they've written it from scrath.
Originally Posted by smitty3268
I've read plenty of complaints already regarding the new toolkit. What does Aura even do that neither GTK nor Qt couldn't do?
Oh you're right. In that case Canonical supports Windows, OS X, Android and Linux. Aura supports Windows and Chrome OS and Linux. So, by this measure alone , Canonical does support more native platforms ;-)
Originally Posted by Calinou