Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Video Acceleration Takes The Backseat On Chrome For Linux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,646

    Default Video Acceleration Takes The Backseat On Chrome For Linux

    Phoronix: Video Acceleration Takes The Backseat On Chrome For Linux

    Due to notorious Linux graphics drivers, Google developers working on Chrome/Chromium aren't looking to enable hardware video acceleration by default anytime soon. The problem ultimately comes down to poor Linux graphics drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYyMDk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    331

    Default

    without gpu aceleration, I suffer tearing with flash pepper, I am really disappointed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Meanwhile, Nvidia has been shipping a stable VDPAU implementation for many years, and the Mesa VDPAU implementation for Radeon and Nouveau graphics is shaping up nicely as well. Why does Google only care about Intel's proprietary VA-API?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    Meanwhile, Nvidia has been shipping a stable VDPAU implementation for many years, and the Mesa VDPAU implementation for Radeon and Nouveau graphics is shaping up nicely as well. Why does Google only care about Intel's proprietary VA-API?
    google trolling the people

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    Meanwhile, Nvidia has been shipping a stable VDPAU implementation for many years, and the Mesa VDPAU implementation for Radeon and Nouveau graphics is shaping up nicely as well. Why does Google only care about Intel's proprietary VA-API?
    Because Intel has been the only so far needing it, software acceleration (specially on now-considered old Intel CPUs/Chipsets) has been bad to barely playable since a long time before (on Windows too).

    They don't think that much on the low end GPUs that need it anyway.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    16

    Default GPU Drivers

    How is it possible? Intel drivers is good enough for playing games like L4D or Portal 2 or support new webgl google maps. VDPAU is supported under (linux not very friendly) flash. Isn't VAAPI supported in media players like XMBC or VLC?
    So why Chrome devs speaks about bad drivers?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    367

    Default

    Mozilla managed to do this with whitelisits. Not sure why Chrome team can not.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shmerl View Post
    Mozilla managed to do this with whitelisits. Not sure why Chrome team can not.
    Yeah. My thoughts exactly. I have the latest OSS stack from git (A8-6500 apu, radeon/r600g driver) and Seamonkey and Firefox run webgl demos just fine and has accelerated playback (decoding too if enabled in the mms.cfg, but that seems to be limited to youtube, flash content on other sites crashes typically).

    Chrome untiil quite recently worked just fine (albeit with generally higher CPU usage than Firefox/Seamonkey) if i disabled its blacklist, but recent versions crapped out, even SD flash video playback is crap and manages to use 200-300% CPU (i have 4 cores). This makes Chrome on Linux with OSS drivers (at least radeon) crap.
    Summing it up, Chrome devs are just lazy - if Firefox could do it, what stops the best funded browser in the world (ok, ONE of them) from implementing it?

    BTW Steam Source games run just perfectly fine on the radeon/OSS drivers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gradinaruvasile View Post
    Yeah. My thoughts exactly. I have the latest OSS stack from git (A8-6500 apu, radeon/r600g driver) and Seamonkey and Firefox run webgl demos just fine and has accelerated playback (decoding too if enabled in the mms.cfg, but that seems to be limited to youtube, flash content on other sites crashes typically).

    Chrome untiil quite recently worked just fine (albeit with generally higher CPU usage than Firefox/Seamonkey) if i disabled its blacklist, but recent versions crapped out, even SD flash video playback is crap and manages to use 200-300% CPU (i have 4 cores). This makes Chrome on Linux with OSS drivers (at least radeon) crap.
    Summing it up, Chrome devs are just lazy - if Firefox could do it, what stops the best funded browser in the world (ok, ONE of them) from implementing it?

    BTW Steam Source games run just perfectly fine on the radeon/OSS drivers.
    I have an apu a8 5600k and I experienced the same issues with google chrome/chromium.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    450

    Default

    So the problems are with drivers that are open?......... something they can help tackle?


    Seems these google guys are just Lazy or don't use linux as main platform.

    Now that Valve is getting intel and amd to improve things a lot ,they should hire someone to look into the video stuff.

    Anyway does chromeOS has acceleration of some kind ? I would think they would enable it at least for their own platform

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •