Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,913

    Default Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

    Phoronix: Mesa 10 Packages For Fedora 20

    While Fedora 20 is looking to land GNOME 3.12 as a stable release upgrade, the developers normally shipping a bleeding-edge Linux graphics stack haven't sent down any stable release updates for the much-improved Mesa 10 drivers. Fortunately, there's some unofficial choices...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYxOTM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default

    I'd rather have a intel driver update than a mesa update. There is a really annoying bug in the version of xorg-x11-drv-intel in f20 which is fixed in 2.9<something>

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    41

    Default Copr Repo Manamger GUI

    Fedora needs a GUI tool to add/remove coper repositories. Most repo files have the same files and such a tool will help Copr become more user friendly.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    I'd rather have a intel driver update than a mesa update. There is a really annoying bug in the version of xorg-x11-drv-intel in f20 which is fixed in 2.9<something>
    I am sure there is more than one bug however one does need a bug report number to refer to the problem you are talking about. Would you mind providing that?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RahulSundaram View Post
    I am sure there is more than one bug however one does need a bug report number to refer to the problem you are talking about. Would you mind providing that?
    No problem:
    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
    I have enabled sna, because well uxa is slow.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    No problem:
    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
    I have enabled sna, because well uxa is slow.
    You probably should file it in Red Hat bugzilla and add a reference to this report and request an update. The fix looks fairly targeted and the Fedora maintainer could consider backporting it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    79

    Default

    here's a New repo for what looks like 10.2 git releases for f20 http://blog.kwizart.fr/post/2014/03/...-for-Fedora-20

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RahulSundaram View Post
    You probably should file it in Red Hat bugzilla and add a reference to this report and request an update. The fix looks fairly targeted and the Fedora maintainer could consider backporting it.
    Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071762

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    here's a New repo for what looks like 10.2 git releases for f20 http://blog.kwizart.fr/post/2014/03/...-for-Fedora-20
    Tried but realized I had upgraded my llvm to 3.4, while this repo is still using llvm 3.3

    I'm afraid it'll take a long time for fedora users to get the full benefits from upstreams.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •