Phoronix: Systemd 210 Already Has Many Changes Piled Up
It looks like the next release of systemd is already imminent after the major systemd 209 update...
The AppArmor addition. Is that a Canonical thing? Would be cool.
SI prefixes for throughput? I always have SI prefixes for everything. The IEC prefixes are largely pointless in this day and age (the only place they still make sense is for RAM amounts). And at that they should be written with "i", instead of "32K" have "32Ki" if you want to mean multiples of 1024.
And just to make it hard for the trolls to pretend they've got facts on their side:
In other words: behaves exactly like any other service, but still enabled by default unless a distro changes it during packaging.- systemd-networkd is no longer statically enabled, but uses the usual [Install] sections so that it can be enabled/disabled using systemctl. It still is enabled by default however.
Last edited by psychoticmeow; 02-24-2014 at 05:00 PM. Reason: NFI why I quoted GreatEmerald
I really like SystemD on how you enable and disable processes but I feel the JournalCtl is lacking, or not dishing up. I feel fault finding is more difficult on SystemD setups than other mechanisms. These comments may not be founded but that's the impression I'm getting without proper research.