Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 144

Thread: KDE's Nepomuk Doesn't Seem To Have A Future

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,660

    Default KDE's Nepomuk Doesn't Seem To Have A Future

    Phoronix: KDE's Nepomuk Doesn't Seem To Have A Future

    It appears there isn't much of a future left to KDE's Nepomuk framework that was developed at a cost of 17 million Euros... It's going to be replaced going forward in the KDE land...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYwNjM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    75

    Arrow My least favorite pokemon

    Good, I hated nepomuk.. That is always one of the first things I disable after installing linux and KDE.. It always runs in the background indexing crap and stuff....just for features that I will never use..

    Does any one else actually use any features from nepomuk?..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Neposuks and Akoncrappi. Goodbye and riddance. Damn bloatware that they tried to shove down our throats.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    453

    Default

    According to your article, Nepomuk does have a future: Baloo.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    280

    Default

    17 million, dear lord, I hope some of the code finds it's way in Baloo otherwise such a waste of money!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    65

    Default

    nepomuk and akinondi are the things that made me switch from KDE to xfce4 to never return back.

    At some point, when they integrated nepomuk into kmail, mail search stopped working! That was the culprit.

    KDE visual 3D effects are very nice but just useless when the apps are just broken by too complex middleware that have weird names.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSDude View Post
    17 million, dear lord, I hope some of the code finds it's way in Baloo otherwise such a waste of money!
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoronix
    Baloo isn't a complete rewrite of Nepomuk as parts were derived from it and its research.

    Quote Originally Posted by lano1106 View Post
    nepomuk and akinondi are the things that made me switch from KDE to xfce4 to never return back.
    You could easily disable it: Disabling the Akonadi subsystem

    Quote Originally Posted by lano1106 View Post
    At some point, when they integrated nepomuk into kmail, mail search stopped working! That was the culprit.
    You can use Mozilla Thunderbird or whatever your heart desires instead.

    Quote Originally Posted by lano1106 View Post
    KDE visual 3D effects are very nice but just useless when the apps are just broken by too complex middleware that have weird names.
    By the way, nothing is hardwired there, you can totally get rid of them by manually compiling them or switching to a source based Linux distribution. Or if you don't like to get in trouble, you can easily disable them by modifying that configuration file (akonadiserverrc) like me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    263

    Default

    I was aware of this change back in December, I even installed and compiled Baloo and Milou, and, if you track the mailing list, the biggest fear of Vishesh Handa with this change was precisely this: that someone shouted "Nepomuk was killed". What indeed was killed is all the integration with Virtuoso, a SPARQL full server with a client/server model that made impossible to run Nepomuk in multi-user environments, and all the code derived from that. Baloo is going to use Xapian, is faster because it's smaller, but feature parity with Nepomuk is a goal.

    So, no, guys, Nepomuk isn't gone. It is going to be replaced by something that does 80% of what the original Nepomuk did, using 20% of the resources (a good twist in the 80/20 rule)

    BTW, try Baloo. I mean seriously, try it. Milou is a Spotlight clone and comes for free. Mail searching, file searching and contact parsing is lightning fast. You don't have to take my word for it, simply try it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Just forgot something quite important:

    Baloo, now, is architecturally similar to Tracker, but it does more than Tracker, since it is designed to reach feature parity with Nepomuk. All this is done while eating significantly less CPU than Tracker (a great effort was spent optimizing the indexers, since Nepomuk was so slow, and Baloo simply reaps from that).

    The question is: Will the Tracker devs join Baloo? Will they refuse to cooperate with Baloo? The reverse question has a simple answer, Baloo does more than Tracker, so Tracker cannot replace Baloo, but Baloo can, theoretically, replace Tracker.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Same here, I just hated nepomuk and akonadi.. I always wondered if they used mlocate, and if not... why. it's really cool and fast, they could have just added metadata on top of that database. nepomuk used to use LOTS of resources for no good reason (mysql? really?!?). And yes, when KDE4 came, I disabled it and moved to other DE. Now I'm back to KDE, and it's been great so far.

    I've always had concerns with respect to my privacy, though... KDE itself is buggy and not very privacy-aware, I think, which means that anyone could have exploited any program and have access to my personal data easily. Call me crazy, but... I didn't see the nepomuk database as a good thing. The KDE devs should be aware of this (for example: what if I share my computer with other people, and I don't want to create another account for them? KDE applications store a LOT of personal data in the system...). I gotta admit, though, I'm not very knowledgeable about how these apps work.
    Last edited by asdfblah; 02-17-2014 at 12:20 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •