Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 92

Thread: No License Needed For Kubuntu Derivatives

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,628

    Default No License Needed For Kubuntu Derivatives

    Phoronix: No License Needed For Kubuntu Derivatives

    After it came out some months ago that Canonical was trying to charge Linux Mint for its usage of Ubuntu as a base for the Linux distribution, the lead Kubuntu developer has made it clear that anyone is free to base off their KDE-focused Ubuntu distribution without fear of being charged...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTYwNDM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,664

    Default

    Hmm, would that force Canonical to also ask Kubuntu to sign a license agreement now? If not, then Linux Mint Kubuntu Edition?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    127

    Default

    I didn't know such a license was even in use. Just lowers my expectations and views of Canonical even further.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    667

    Default

    I also didn't knew about them and Linux Mint...that really makes my opinion about Ubuntu goes down the toillet....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by computerquip View Post
    I didn't know such a license was even in use. Just lowers my expectations and views of Canonical even further.
    And that Canonical licenses their trademarks for free to Kubuntu lowers your expectations why exactly?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    29

    Default

    yep... i will abandon unity!
    its sad, i really like global menu!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    221

    Default money!

    money is everething in the world, look red hat and centOS

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    And that Canonical licenses their trademarks for free to Kubuntu lowers your expectations why exactly?
    This isn't about trademark licensing, it is about binary licensing. Ubuntu is arguing that, although the source is under an open license, the compiled binaries are not.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amagnoni View Post
    yep... i will abandon unity!
    its sad, i really like global menu!
    Me too, and I also like the HUD brought up by the Alt key too. They should have just taken Wayland Minor fragmentations aren't problems, but when the display servers cause fragmentation, uh... oh... Unless they can turn Mir into Wayland.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by computerquip View Post
    I didn't know such a license was even in use. Just lowers my expectations and views of Canonical even further.
    Same here. Unless they pay Debian, it's a real scumbag move how they mooch of debian but they charge others. To be fair though, (IIRC) Mint does use Ubuntu's servers, whereas Ubuntu doesn't use Debian's servers. On the other hand, considering Mint is gaining more popularity than Ubuntu, it is fair that Canonical doesn't want to be paying so much for someone else's distro.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •