Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 222

Thread: Richard Stallman Calls LLVM A "Terrible Setback"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,186

    Default Richard Stallman Calls LLVM A "Terrible Setback"

    Phoronix: Richard Stallman Calls LLVM A "Terrible Setback"

    In the days since Eric S. Raymond had some choice words about GCC vs. Clang, the bickering and fighting over GCC vs. Clang compilers has continued. Richard M. Stallman has come out this morning on the Free Software Foundation's mailing list with his views to reiterate...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU4MjA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    468

    Default

    If the core of LLVM remains open and free, is that enough?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    I am with Stallman on this one. Also gcc is still better than clang. That may change, but for now clang has no advantage other than it is the new and cool stuff for kiddies. This may be good for journalists and fanbois but GCC is still the first choice.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    570

    Default

    And Stallman's agenda now becomes clear.

    "You must give your stuff to us with no restrictions because we want them and we need them to help us, but you're not getting your hands on OUR stuff because we don't want to help others ."

    against the BSD's

    "Take our stuff and feel free to use it anyway you want if it helps, and give back as much as you want when you feel like it"
    Last edited by Sonadow; 01-24-2014 at 11:27 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    39

    Default

    i love how bias against RMS Michale is, R;S never spoke against the technical advantages of LLVM, but agains the consequences of using a license that would allow non free code, guess ABE is on again.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    38

    Default

    LLVM came from academia (like the BSDs) and not created for the benefit of some political ideology.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh, UK
    Posts
    53

    Default

    I agree with Stallman too. But this might be a reminder to improve GCC further because now there is a competition.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    106

    Default

    I tend to always agree with Stallman, he's an incredibly bright individual. And really, LLVM/Clang isn't that much better if at all than GCC right now, but the competition between the two will end up giving both a boost in features and performance. That's just the way the world works.

    But I will say this much, they haven't ported LLVM/Clang to Classic Amigas, so I'll stick with using GCC, thank you very much!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    754

    Default

    So many misconceptions.. A non free program using permissive code would not necessarily have been open source had the code been copylefted, just as piracy does not equate to lost sales...

    If he prefers "no code" than "proprietary code", then I don't want his "freedom".

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    359

    Default

    Stallman is wrong to this one. He has a limited vision for the word freedom. A closed program that runs on all platforms is more free than an open one that runs only on one (i speak for hardware and software). In our case GCC did take the Intel road for statically linking compilation as MS compilers did. So they benefit mostly Intel and x86 monopoly and Instruction_set based computing, and they stall technology. We have the same computing for 40 years. I prefer a BSD LLVM because i am thinking than if consoles like PS4 use it, and some graphic engines use it as well, there is a huge change to get rid of x86 processors, in favor of better processors or free processors and easy emulation. I don't understand something: What is the importance to have something free (copy left), that doesn't work or can't be used with a new vision of what is beneficial for as in our time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •