Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Reiser4 File-System Now Works For Linux 3.13 Kernel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,309

    Default Reiser4 File-System Now Works For Linux 3.13 Kernel

    Phoronix: Reiser4 File-System Now Works For Linux 3.13 Kernel

    For the devout fans of the Reiser4 file-system, the latest out-of-tree patches are now available so this open-source FS works on the Linux 3.13 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU5Njg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Cool

    Reiser4 rocks!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    277

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frign View Post
    Reiser4 rocks!
    Absolutely! It kills the competition

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13

    Default

    I remember back then there was a kernel patch that named the filesystem murderfs...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    46

    Default

    I don't even remeber how long ago I used Reiser4 ... must be at least 5 years now. It'd be interesting how it compares to current filesystems like btrfs, ext 4, zfs or xfs (I always mingle those two up).
    Other than that ... it doesn't seem to make much sense to keep it around for other purposes than accessing old data. And I can't imagine many people still use it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Phoronix already had a file system comparison with Reiser 4 and it showed that it was better than btrfs and very close to ext4.

    I'd like to see a Tux3 vs Reiser4 vs NTFS vs HPS+ (I think that's the mac one) vs Ext4 vs Btrfs vs Fat32 vs exFAT vs ZFS? and other ones sitting around and such.
    Eh, maybe it's a little overkill.

    Oh, and I'd want them tested on some RAM, SSD, and a HDD
    9 x 3 = 27. That's 27 tests that I'm not sure someone would want to do, especially if there's no noticable improvements stated for any of them. (except for tux3)

    But I would like to see how the future replacements perform against each other above all.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wargames View Post
    Absolutely! It kills the competition
    I can't tell if this is supposed to be pun done in poor (hilarious) taste

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,025

    Default Reiser4 was very interesting when it came out

    But that was a long time ago. I don't think it really has any compelling arguments vs ext4 and btrfs anymore. It's probably time to just let it die peacefully, now.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I remember the days when a university student could just surprise the world with some code and that was good enough. Now if it's not backed by a "vendor" (i.e. Red Hat) then it's dangerous crapola.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    374

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cjcox View Post
    I remember the days when a university student could just surprise the world with some code and that was good enough. Now if it's not backed by a "vendor" (i.e. Red Hat) then it's dangerous crapola.
    But you know that Reiser4 was backed by a vendor (namely Namesys but also by DARPA and Linspire) ? The problem is that Hans Reiser went to jail and as a result of this his company Namesys died. AFAIK the people still working on Reiser4 are ex Namesys employees. Anyway, all this has nothing to do with university student vs. vendor, Linus vs. Hans or whatever you wanted to tell us.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •