Originally posted by Vim_User
View Post
So both answers are wrong, neigher have I evience for this nor do I make it just up. Its just very likely that its true, because of the facts we know.
presumption of innocense is a good concept in law engagements. If its about trust it works differently. I dont have to trust somebody when they misused my trust so hard. (big american companies). And even worse, even when valve people dont want to harm us, the nsa can force them to do it and force them to not talk about it. We know that as a fact. So why should I trust them?
It looks at the moment more than nsa does everything taht is theoretical possible and costs less than 1 billion dollars. And its easy to do, so why would they not do that?
Comment