Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: CompuLab Utilite: A Tiny, Low-Power, Low-Cost, ARM Linux Desktop

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,190

    Default CompuLab Utilite: A Tiny, Low-Power, Low-Cost, ARM Linux Desktop

    Phoronix: CompuLab Utilite: A Tiny, Low-Power, Low-Cost, ARM Linux Desktop

    When it comes to Linux-friendly hardware vendors one of my favorite companies to deal with at Phoronix is CompuLab. The Israeli PC vendor isn't just rebadging some OEM systems and slapping on a Tux sticker nor are they assembling some x86 systems that individuals could easily build at a lower cost. We have reviewed several interesting low-power Linux PCs from them in the past and today may be one of their most interesting products yet, the Freescale i.MX6-based Utilite. In this review is a look at the Utilite Pro, which is my new favorite pre-assembled ARM Linux desktop.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19801

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    38

    Default

    It's cool and all, but a bit before its time. I will wait until a more standardised system based on 64-bit ARMv8 (probably based on the new server standard) before buying in. I'd like to see something with very good hardware video encoders, that would eliminate most of my need for powerful Intel CPUs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    18

    Default

    The form factor is great, and the performance is okay.

    Might be good for people who want a home server that's always on (the low power aspect) with more RAM than a Raspberry Pi, with a reasonable amount of storage for local stuff (how fast is the 32GB SSD?), especially if it can also work as a media device (make use of those video outputs!). USB HD required there though, I hope the USB ports can provide enough power for a decent external USB HD.

    It's also cheaper in the long term than many cheap web-hosting services, and probably has more RAM, storage and CPU power than those cheap services provide in their virtualised environments.

    I'm not looking this year for such a device, but maybe next year... I'd like a ~2GHz quad-core Cortex A53 next time please :-) I presume some variants of the i.MX7 will use these...?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    285

    Default

    would be nice to start seeing some tests of open src graphics on some of these devices. GC2000 support for etnaviv is making some progress and hopefully usable pretty soon.. or some device with earlier vivante core which is already working with etnaviv. And a review of the inforce ifc6410 with freedreno (or bstem board, or apq8074 dragonaboard), especially in a day or two when I am ready to push the new compiler work for freedreno, would be interesting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Intel is coming out with a Bay Trail NUC Kit these days. Would be very interesting to see how this thing stacks up against Atom.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nils_ View Post
    Intel is coming out with a Bay Trail NUC Kit these days. Would be very interesting to see how this thing stacks up against Atom.
    The top of the range tegra / snapdragon / intel stuff all look close enough, at least on the gpu front, that any one of them can be shown besting the others. Just a matter of the power and thermal budget for the devices being compared, and how hard you cheat. (In case you are wondering how each vendor manages benchmarks that show it beating the others. Remember, "lies, damn lies, and mobile device benchmarks"..) So interesting times :-)

    Ofc the intel open src driver is considerably more mature than the other mobile open src drivers. So I expect if you are just looking at the open drivers, intel hw will get closer to it's theoretical limits. But once the new compiler work lands in freedreno, we should also be getting reasonably close to what the hw is capable of.. at least other than the hand full of edge cases that will still fall back to the old compiler for now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    SuperUserLand
    Posts
    538

    Default

    hmmm.... I'm really interested but I can't order since our customs would apply at least 150 euros in taxes... probably more if they see 'made in Israel'.


    Anyone from the european union going to israel in the coming months?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robclark View Post
    And a review of the inforce ifc6410 with freedreno (or bstem board, or apq8074 dragonaboard), especially in a day or two when I am ready to push the new compiler work for freedreno, would be interesting.
    Michael does accept guest articles. He probably won't have the knowledge to set up freedreno, perhaps you could write the review?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pallidus View Post
    hmmm.... I'm really interested but I can't order since our customs would apply at least 150 euros in taxes... probably more if they see 'made in Israel'.


    Anyone from the european union going to israel in the coming months?
    Dude, check. The EU has good sites for this purpose.

    Importing computers from Israel? No customs duty, you only pay VAT, ~35 euros depending on where you are.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Michael does accept guest articles. He probably won't have the knowledge to set up freedreno, perhaps you could write the review?
    True, although I suppose I might be biased, and I probably don't have such a complete benchmark setup as Michael ;-)

    That said, if Michael or someone did want to do a mobile/embedded open src graphics round up, myself and folks on #freedreno can certainly help with freedreno setup. (Which for freedreno currently amounts to custom kernel + generic armhf fedora f20 userspace + latest git master mesa.) And likewise I think wumpus and the good folks on #etnaviv could help for utilite. A comparison of utilite vs inforce vs intel NUC would certainly be interesting. I'm pretty sure on the driver front, intel will win on functionality and performance, as it is already a very mature driver. But we are getting to the point on etnaviv and freedreno where it could be interesting to start charting progress.

    Plus on utilite there is at least the option to also compare against blob driver. Something I *wish* I could do w/ freedreno, but sadly only android blob driver for adreno..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •