Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: Btrfs Gets Big Changes, Features In Linux 3.14 Kernel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,653

    Default Btrfs Gets Big Changes, Features In Linux 3.14 Kernel

    Phoronix: Btrfs Gets Big Changes, Features In Linux 3.14 Kernel

    While the EXT4 changes and XFS alterations for the Linux 3.14 kernel weren't too exciting, the Btrfs file-system update was submitted today for Linux 3.14 and it's definitely exciting...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU4ODA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,542

    Default

    I wonder if making use of immutable biovars is in this pull or not...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    91

    Default

    still no lz4 support

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    527

    Default

    I haven't had my btrfs volume balancing for a few days now, because of some kernel bug that should see patches in an early 1.13 release.

    Hoping I can last that long, I backed up the disc already.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    34

    Default

    This pull request has sysfs additions and doesn't come with the mandatory Documentation/ABI entries?
    Or user-friendly documentation for that matter?
    For shame.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mercutio View Post
    still no lz4 support
    As far as I know, no one is actually working on this right now. It doesn't seem as though there is anyone who is interested enough in this at the moment, as there continues to be lots going on in btrfs development.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    235

    Default

    Is there or will there be an effort to make ensure that BTRFS is as fast as or faster than EXT4? I know BTRFS is all about features rather than performance, but the average home user doesn't need all of those advanced features. For me, faster makes a less painful time redoing my operating system and transfering all of my files every 6 months.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prescience500 View Post
    Is there or will there be an effort to make ensure that BTRFS is as fast as or faster than EXT4? I know BTRFS is all about features rather than performance, but the average home user doesn't need all of those advanced features. For me, faster makes a less painful time redoing my operating system and transfering all of my files every 6 months.
    they're both pretty fast for most purposes, and pretty slow for things like maildir mailboxes.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prescience500 View Post
    Is there or will there be an effort to make ensure that BTRFS is as fast as or faster than EXT4? I know BTRFS is all about features rather than performance, but the average home user doesn't need all of those advanced features. For me, faster makes a less painful time redoing my operating system and transfering all of my files every 6 months.

    If you have an ssd use f2fs. That seems to be pretty much the fastest one around. Well, maybe not for db, or heavily queued work.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prescience500 View Post
    Is there or will there be an effort to make ensure that BTRFS is as fast as or faster than EXT4? I know BTRFS is all about features rather than performance, but the average home user doesn't need all of those advanced features. For me, faster makes a less painful time redoing my operating system and transfering all of my files every 6 months.
    Checksum file integrity, transparent compression, and cow snapshots are features I couldn't live without.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •