Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Testing Out The Configurable TDP On AMD's Kaveri

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spittie View Post
    Interesting results, Kaveri really does good when paired with a low TDP.
    It's also showed by the A8-7600, which in most benchmarks is always just 10/15% slower than the A10-7850K, while having a lower TDP and a lower clock. (Too bad that AMD didn't send you one of those too, Tje A8 should be ~$70 cheaper than the A10 when it hit the market, so a comparision under Linux would have been interesting).

    It really shows that Kaveri was optimized to work with low TDP. Or maybe it's just because it's using 28nm SHP, who knows.


    It's also interesting to see the Watt per FPS performance (results rounded, I've assumed that auto is 95W):
    Xonotic
    45W - 2.95 W/fps
    50W - 2.8 W/fps
    55W - 2.63 W/fps
    60W - 2.43 W/fps
    65W - 2.3 W/fps
    95W - 1.71 W/fps

    x264
    45W - 1.53 W/fps
    50W - 1.48 W/fps
    55W - 1.4 W/fps
    60W - 1.31 W/fps
    65W - 1.26 W/fps
    95W - 0.97 W/fps
    You do realize that TDP is a measure of heat production not energy draw right? Hence it expanding to: Thermal Design Power...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    816

    Default

    This is one of the features I found really interesting. New, tech-stuffish and definitely interesting. While you won't enable it on raw compiling, video rendering or excessive gaming, you might throttle it down nicely for HTPCs, surf stations and so on. You could even buy them in 10 packs with a rebate and then put them in different boxes for different purposes. Just configure one to be your little HTPC with ASIC aided video decoding and one as you big boom machine for Gentoo compiling or similar things.

    The mainboard looks also interesting though I'd rather go with the A88X-Plus cause it has 3 classic legacy old school PCI slots (for my bazillion of PCI cards I still have and use), as well as lots of SATA and USB headers.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke_Wolf View Post
    You do realize that TDP is a measure of heat production not energy draw right? Hence it expanding to: Thermal Design Power...
    You do realise that the laws of thermodynamics still applies? If it's producing 45W of heat, it's at least using 45W of electricity.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Cool! Thanks for the 45 W and 65 W TDP numbers! I assume they'd be in the same ballpark as the A8-7600.

    As for TDP, it's my understanding that it is determined by measuring the average (or peak minus outlier spikes) power consumption during a particular type of prolonged stressful CPU load and case temperature. For Intel, their TDP measurements are done doing some "typical" software loads while AMD uses more stressful loads (ie. benchmarking software) so AMD TDPs and Intel TDPs can't exactly be compared directly. I guess with integrated GPUs they also add GPU loads.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    389

    Default Interesting things are afoot in AMD land.

    The current model only implements two of the four possible memory controllers. So it looks like AMD has the intention to address the RAM bandwidth issue one way or another. The another being GDDR graphics RAM.

    Quote Originally Posted by stiiixy View Post
    Yes, it's the RAM-bound GPU that makes the GPU look 'unaffected' from what I can tell. There was a discussion about this a couple weeks ago in another article which lead Michael to then go and do another article based on Kaveria (sorry, no link. I just use the RSS feeds) a couple days ago about this which pretty much backed up the theories (which was originally about how bound to RAM the onboard GPU's from even the early days actually were).
    This has always I been an issue with APUs. In fact it was an issue when GPUs wgphere integrated into external chip sets. Nothing beats bandwidth for a GPU.
    It's why I've always bought the highest compatible RAM for my HTPC's and low-end machines. No point burning power that's unused because the GPU was throttled. But now we can reduce the power usgae (with proof yet to come on ACTUAL power consumption) and still get damn fine GPU-based performance. Good times all-round I say, especially in light of games not really requiring much in the way CPU performance.
    This new APU of AMDs is a bigger leap forward than a lot of people want to admit to. Frankly these days there are many applications where the CPU not the most important element of the machine, it isn't just gaming.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gigaplex View Post
    You do realise that the laws of thermodynamics still applies? If it's producing 45W of heat, it's at least using 45W of electricity.
    Not quite because the TDP defines an approximate of the maximum amount of heat that the processor is allowed to produce, and has no bearing to how much heat is produced during any particular workload, only that the heat produced is (supposed to be) < TDP, now how this is measured though varies between vendors as guido said. AMD pushes their processor to the wall when determining this, Intel not so hard.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke_Wolf View Post
    You do realize that TDP is a measure of heat production not energy draw right? Hence it expanding to: Thermal Design Power...
    Yes, but it's obviously going to draw less current if it has to release less heat
    I know it's not exactly the best way to compare stuff, but I think that it still show how well Kaveri does at the lower end.

    @Everyone else
    Yes, FPS/W.
    I realized that I've got it flipped after 5 minutes (stupid 5 minutes limit...), and my second post was put into moderation for whatever reason.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    642

    Default

    Michael, can we have actual chart(s) about the real power drain when cTDP is set to 45W ?
    Because i know that one thing is what we set it for and another is what it is really spending....and i know from A8-7600 reviews.

    AMD says that other Kaveris besides A8-7600 will be less eficient with cTDP set, so, i was curious about actual values of a A10-7850K set to 45W.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    72

    Default

    I also can't find numbers about the resulting CPU frequencies for the cTdp settings. That would be very helpful, too.

    Anyway, thanks for the first cTDP related benchmarks I can find in the net!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •