Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 64

Thread: NVIDIA Is Still Killing AMD Over Linux OpenGL Performance

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    227

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by felipe View Post
    Amd sucks on linux desktop but is great on android(adreno). Maybe we should buy tablets and evol, also the radeon cards tested are inferior to the nvidia cards
    Adreno is from Qualcomm. It was owned by ATI/AMD until 2008, but the brand name over there was not adreno, but Imageon.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,614

    Default

    As much as I love to throw sunshine and lollipops NVIDIA's way... I have to admit that I feel that the driver quality has been regressing a lot in recent years. It seems like every driver version introduces some new esoteric bug and they don't really give the impression that they care much to fix it.

    The codebase must be a complete trainwreck if simply touching one area makes the whole thing fall apart.

    Performance is kinda good... but only when the driver kinda works. So I can get 1,000 fps in L4D2 until the game hangs in the safe room. That's the sort of thing that doesn't show up in the benchmarks.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TemplarGR View Post
    You are doing it wrong. If game performance and video playback are the most important things for you, then you need Windows or a console...

    Nice trolling attempt though...
    Nice trolling.

    Intel drivers suffer random tearing for me, with nvidia I can play metro , serious sam bfe 3, dota 2, half life, counter strike, left 4 dead 2 etc, very smooth, and I have Windows 8.1 too for playing battlefield 4.
    Last edited by pandev92; 01-20-2014 at 12:45 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
    We're customers, not investors. I'll be willing to give AMD some credit only if they officially move majority of resources from Catalyst for Linux to the os driver. It's not like Linux popped up a year ago, you know.
    Exactly - excellent point. While I myself own AMD cards and haven't bought an nvidia product in over 10 years (I don't buy new hardware often), I would still recommend nvidia to linux gamers or anyone who really cares about overall GPU performance. Intel is fine for laptops or low-end desktops.

    I appreciate AMD's open source efforts and they're really making good steady progress, but they decided to put this effort in a little too late. I'm sure they're not keeping up with catalyst because it WILL be obsoleted, it's just a matter of when. So, they're basically putting enough attention into it to make sure it "works" but otherwise they'd probably get rid of catalyst if they could.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zanny View Post
    This is still supporting the only company that puts almost 0 effort into any foss projects.
    Who cares? I want results! I didn't bought my hardware to support politics. I bought it to play games...

    Happy Nvidia owner who have purchased Wargame European Escalation, Left 4 Dead 2 and Half Life 2 just to play them on Linux. Performance is on par with Windows and thats FANTASTIC!

    Never installed them on Windows.
    Last edited by verde; 01-20-2014 at 12:52 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Dude, what is up with the weird Xonotic benchmarks? Is there a CPU bottleneck going on?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by verde View Post
    Never installed them on Windows.
    I a liar..
    I did for testing..

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pandev92 View Post
    Nice trolling.

    Intel drivers suffer random tearing for me, with nvidia I can play metro , serious sam bfe 3, dota 2, half life, counter strike, left 4 dead 2 etc, very smooth, and I have Windows 8.1 too for playing battlefield 4.
    You said it yourself. You have Windows 8.1 ... So i am right. Nuff said...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    30

    Default

    @verde i can play with HL2, Dota or l4d2 on my cape verde (hd7770) powered by galium3d
    but fact is that my old GT9600 can handle Metro LL or Metro2033 by wine and my hd7700 not (catalyst or radeonsi doens't matter) i've still hope

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    83

    Default

    I've had to many bad experiences with AMD/ATI cards, both drivers and bundled apps, even with Windows, to ever buy one again.

    OK, a closed binary blob is a political fail for OSS, but at the end of the day it's NVidia's intellectual property and as long as you know in advance that's what you're buying into, then that's your choice.

    Qualcomm/Adreno is just as bad.

    Hopefully as Intel make progress on power and performance and the linux driver remains reasonably open, it will put pressure on NVidia and AMD to do more.

    I don't know much about Arm's own Mali hardware and drivers to comment, but I think they're better than Adreno, NVidia and AMD?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •