Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: BUG performance per watt

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    245

    Default BUG performance per watt

    http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...04-Linux/page2
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...perfwatt&num=1

    Basically I think the test suite did

    watts / time

    when it should of been

    time / watts

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Which would give you seconds taken per watt, with the best score being the lowest number.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Or, alternatively it could be converted into

    time X watts = joules used

    Which would show which one used the most power for the given task.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    245

    Default

    Ok. Seems like people like the joules idea.

    http://phoronix.com/forums/showthrea...04-Linux/page2

    Watt x time = joules
    Smaller is better.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    245

    Default

    I've been corrected on the forum.
    time / watts is also wrong.

    watts x time = joules is accurate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •