Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: AMD A10-7850K Radeon R7 Graphics Comparison

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,620

    Default AMD A10-7850K Radeon R7 Graphics Comparison

    Phoronix: AMD A10-7850K Radeon R7 Graphics Comparison

    The latest benchmarks of the AMD A10-7850K APU to share on Phoronix and to complement yesterday's Windows vs. Linux OpenGL comparison are benchmarks of the APU's Radeon R7 Graphics compared to numerous AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19673

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts
    203

    Default

    What's the clock of the memory? I wonder if the relatively higher performance of the lower power skus found in anandtech's review is somehow related to a memory bandwith bottleneck. It would be really cool if someone could explore this aspect and run graphics benchmarks with really high clocked memory.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Figueiredo View Post
    What's the clock of the memory? I wonder if the relatively higher performance of the lower power skus found in anandtech's review is somehow related to a memory bandwith bottleneck. It would be really cool if someone could explore this aspect and run graphics benchmarks with really high clocked memory.
    DDR3-2133MHz.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    DDR3-2133MHz.
    The Xonotic tests look good for not having 24k memory but I think furmark could of benefited more by it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Why is this NVIDIA 520 so awfully slow? I guess there won't be a market anymore for these low end cards.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,240

    Default It'd be nice to compare this to other integrated gpus

    Like the Intel ones, rather than just discrete graphics cards.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    It'd be nice to compare this to other integrated gpus like the Intel ones, rather than just discrete graphics cards.
    Seconded. Comparison with dedicated cards is fine, too, but of course it would make sense to compare in-chipset graphics or on-CPU / APUs with it as well. Especially since dedicated cards have their own memory while APUs have system memory and here we have possible bottlenecks in memory controllers and esp. the memory itself.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    624

    Default

    Typo in page 2: "In Unigine Valley the Radeon R7 Graphics on the Kaveri API were about the same speed as a GeForce GT 240.". API => APU.

    Micheal, out of curiosity, what case are you using?

    Also, why is the 7850 so much behind the 550 Ti? There is something wrong. Your benchmark results seem inconsistent and thus unreliable...

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adarion View Post
    Seconded. Comparison with dedicated cards is fine, too, but of course it would make sense to compare in-chipset graphics or on-CPU / APUs with it as well. Especially since dedicated cards have their own memory while APUs have system memory and here we have possible bottlenecks in memory controllers and esp. the memory itself.
    It's coming in a later article has been already mentioned.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    Micheal, out of curiosity, what case are you using?
    No idea, AMD sent it out with the rest of the Kaveri stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    Also, why is the 7850 so much behind the 550 Ti? There is something wrong. Your benchmark results seem inconsistent and thus unreliable...
    Driver changes? All of it is reproducible and documented via PTS/OB.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •