Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 101

Thread: SteamOS Didn't Use Ubuntu Over Legal Issues

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,186

    Default SteamOS Didn't Use Ubuntu Over Legal Issues

    Phoronix: SteamOS Didn't Use Ubuntu Over Legal Issues

    Last month when SteamOS was publicly made available in beta form there were many surprised that Valve based their Linux distribution off Debian rather than Ubuntu, which they had been heavily promoting up to this point for Linux gaming. There was some speculation why Valve went with Debian, but Gabe Newell has now confirmed the reasoning for not basing their operating system off Ubuntu...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU2Mjc

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    201

    Default

    Sucks to be Ubuntu.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Good ridance

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    107

    Default

    Hmmm... Could this be over the GPLv3? Some ubuntu components use the GPLv3 I believe (besides Mir I mean). I reserve the right to be completely wrong about this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hiryu View Post
    Hmmm... Could this be over the GPLv3? Some ubuntu components use the GPLv3 I believe (besides Mir I mean). I reserve the right to be completely wrong about this.
    So does Debian. So very much doubt it.

    I would have thought technical issues would be the cause, but technical issues could have been why developers below stopped pushing for Ubuntu, leaving management time to figure out an idea "completely on their own without the stupid knowledge from their underlings". So yeah, "legal issues". there are always lots of those, likely their fork wouldn't be allowed to be called ubuntu, or allowed to advertise it as ubuntu compatible, leaving the benefit of following the brandname moot.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Mark Shuttlworth must be some kind of idiot, and Ubuntu is going to die with his new direction, I'm sure just 4 years ago before all this nonsense with Unity they would've gladly let them use Ubuntu for Steam OS, now they want to be paid?

    "Pay us to double our userbase and create games for it" It's not like Valve's not giving you any benefit, in fact what they're going to give you is more beneficial than money, a FUCKING SIGNIFICANT USERBASE. Not just some 1% bullshit.
    Last edited by Jebril; 01-07-2014 at 02:52 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    I see no problem for Valve to use Debian as base, but they could have a more complete repository. You can not build packages when they only keep the installed packages and remove the rest. The source is complete however but it could be done better.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,287

    Default

    For the non-german speakers, does the linked article explain which kind of legal issues there are?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jebril View Post
    now they want to be paid?
    Source?
    Ubuntu is Free software, no one can force you to pay Canonical to use/fork/distribute it.
    The only Canonical power is about the trademark "Ubuntu" but Valve named its OS "Steam OS" so there is no problem here.

    Also Mir can't be an explanation because Valve already maintains its own patched/up-to-date graphic stack for Steam OS, so they could have done the very same thing against Ubuntu. Same thing regarding the Kernel.
    Beside, X will remains in standard Ubuntu repositories for at least as long as it will be in Debian.

    I'm really curious about those alleged "Legal issues". I hope Gabe will give some more details.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    They do not maintain an own gfx stack, they reused the Debian experimental mesa package with some lowered/removed depends. But that mesa package is not the best, maybe oibaf could help the Debian strike force a bit as he already packages what i need like vdpau drivers. Compared to the Ubuntu package the used Debian mesa also misses libapi which is needed to compile glamor. And thats needed for radeonsi (which is funnyly inside the mesa package).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •