Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Linksys Reviving The WRT54G Router In 802.11AC Form

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,104

    Default Linksys Reviving The WRT54G Router In 802.11AC Form

    Phoronix: Linksys Reviving The WRT54G Router In 802.11AC Form

    Many Phoronix readers likely recall the glory years of the open-source-friendly Linksys WRT54G router that for some is still a great device and there's still the thriving OpenWRT community. Good news out of CES today is that Linksys is letting the WRT54G live-on in the form of the 802.11ac-based WRT1900AC...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU2MTg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,103

    Default

    Way too expensive.

    Also the old Linksys was owned by Cicso.
    Nowadays it is owned by Belkin which I trust much less.

  3. #3

    Default

    This should be about the WRT54GL? The WRT54GL is the router with Linux based firmware that can be easily used with DD/Open WRT (i use one right now with DD-WRT). Some of the G/GS variants arent that OSS friendly AFAIK.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    422

    Default

    For $300 I'd build a computer and stick a bunch of network adapters in it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1

    Default

    "the open-source-friendly Linksys WRT54G"? You must be joking. As mentioned above the WRT54GL was the one that made it at least a bit opensource-friendly. The required Broadcom chip driver was still closed source and using it required running a 2.4x kernel. There were reverse enigeneering efforts like brcm47xx but in the time a ran OpenWRT on the WRT54GL 2.6 based brcm47xx has never been stable enough to be usable. It was a great device per specs, but the lack of opensource-friendlyness was actually the main reason why I replaced mines with some Buffalo WZRsomething later.

    On some other news page the wording in regards to OpenWRT-compatibility was "they are going to port OpenWRT to it" which sounds rather awkward, given OpenWRT uses a Linux kernel with a minimum possible amount of patches. So, does Linux now run on hat new thing out of the box, or will OpenWRT devs be required to maintain a package for some binary driver blob sh*t yet again and Linksys will just work with them to get things (resp: the mess) started?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    536

    Default

    They miss the point of the WRT54G that was taking cheap common hardware and doing nice things with it.
    For that kind of money, just glue a 802.11ac router to an arm board or something...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,600

    Default

    Many Phoronix readers likely recall the glory years of the open-source-friendly Linksys WRT54G
    Recall the glory years? *looks to the left* Yeah, my WRT54GL is running as fine as ever, thank you very much. That said, for the longest time I didn't know projects like DD-WRT existed. Then I found out they do, and now I'm running DD-WRT on it (and enjoying features like LAN computer names much easier to type in "ssh user@dragon" than "ssh user@192.168.1.103" and hope the IP hasn't changed since last time). And now that I do, I won't buy any routers without DD-WRT support.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    now I'm running DD-WRT on it (and enjoying features like LAN computer names – much easier to type in "ssh user@dragon" than "ssh user@192.168.1.103" and hope the IP hasn't changed since last time).
    thats why I use dns

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by philip550c View Post
    thats why i use dns
    :d 1234

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgui View Post
    :d 1234
    What is that supposed to mean? Maybe I should reiterate, thats why I use dns and static ips.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •