Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Ubuntu GNOME Might Fail To Do A 14.04 LTS Release

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,396

    Default Ubuntu GNOME Might Fail To Do A 14.04 LTS Release

    Phoronix: Ubuntu GNOME Might Fail To Do A 14.04 LTS Release

    The Ubuntu GNOME distribution that packages up the latest GNOME Shell 3 desktop environment atop Ubuntu Linux is already conceding their low on resources and might be incapable of doing a 14.04 LTS release come next spring...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTU1Mjk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    ... is already conceding their low on resources ...
    Their low on resources what?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Gnome per say is a dead horse. Ubuntu has killed it twice by releasing old versions of Gnome. I highly doubt there would be anymore interest in gnome, that too in ubuntu community.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hadrons123 View Post
    Gnome per say is a dead horse. Ubuntu has killed it twice by releasing old versions of Gnome. I highly doubt there would be anymore interest in gnome, that too in ubuntu community.
    You actually meant "per se" right?
    (just to make sure)

    About GNOME, many distros still use it. You can say it's a falling plane, I don't know if it is(and i don't thing so), but I won't say you're wrong either. However if you say it's a dead horse, I'd really say no, since there still are many people using it. Distros like Debian ship it as default too; and also as a result, SteamOS uses GNOME for the desktop mode, and this particular OS is a highly unpredictable variable, since it still has the potential to add a "desktop linux" distro(GNU/Linux if you would) to the living room(and later probably desktop) of many gamers.
    Also don't forget that Ubuntu has replaced part of GNOME only, it does use Nautilus, gedit, File Roller, brasero etc. in Unity. Not sure about the terminal, but I guess, that too(or no?).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    106

    Default

    I can't understand the point of Gnome on Ubuntu over, say just installing Debian with Gnome. Frankly, if you're not using Unity, Ubuntu is pointless at this point.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kaprikawn View Post
    I can't understand the point of Gnome on Ubuntu over, say just installing Debian with Gnome. Frankly, if you're not using Unity, Ubuntu is pointless at this point.
    Ubuntu has an amazing amount of third-party PPAs that debian can't use. Extremely useful.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppercats View Post
    Ubuntu has an amazing amount of third-party PPAs that debian can't use. Extremely useful.
    Which you can use in Mint or a zillion other Ubuntu-derivatives...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Although Unity, Pantheon, and Cinnamon have been changing why people pick a certain distro, repositories and installation are mostly what set different GNOME distros apart. So we should really just focus on getting SuSE, Fedora, or Debian into a shape where it's competitive with Ubuntu's basic user-friendly features. That is, a better installer and a more lax attitude towards patented things like codecs.

    Unfortunately, the only distro I can think of that has a good relationship with upstream, good repos, and an understanding of closed software on occasion is Arch. Not exactly the easiest to install.

    So I'd say if we can assemble some of those good things into one coherent place, it's an obvious choice to stop pulling teeth to get an Ubuntu GNOME release. Simply put, Ubuntu should cultivate an environment where any DE is usable on their platform without stepping on anyone's toes. If they create incompatibilities unnecessarily, it's not our responsibility to fix it.

    I'd love for GNOME Ubuntu to continue, but it's already facing issues keeping up to date to begin with.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default I accept your trolling challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by hadrons123 View Post
    Gnome per say is a dead horse. Ubuntu has killed it twice by releasing old versions of Gnome. I highly doubt there would be anymore interest in gnome, that too in ubuntu community.
    Indeed, Ubuntu is the dead horse, and this news just confirms the sinking of Ubuntu, not Gnome.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default I don't want to use PPAs

    Quote Originally Posted by peppercats View Post
    Ubuntu has an amazing amount of third-party PPAs that debian can't use. Extremely useful.
    I think that's a point to use Debian and not the other way around. I'm one former Ubuntu and advocate that has fully switched to Debian even for my relative's computers. I also like Gnome3 very much, far from dying, the best desktop to date. Gnome3 was almost unusable on Ubuntu, it works great on Debian.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •